Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1155/2017/7943467
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zhao Y
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen S;Zhang L;Yan G;Cheng S;Fathy AH;Yan N;Zhao Y
Plenty of studies were conducted to explore the prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ovarian cancer with contradictory results. This study aims to summarize the prognostic significance of NLR in patients with ovarian cancer. A literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Eleven studies involving a total of 2,892 patients were identified. The results indicated that patients with high NLR had shorter PFS compared to patients with low NLR in ovarian cancer (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.15–2.08, p = 0.004, and I2 = 61%). Similarly, high NLR was related to shorter OS (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23, p = 0.04, and I2 = 85%). Moreover, high NLR was significantly associated with shorter PFS when the NLR cut-off was less than 3.3 (p = 0.03) or when treatment is operation (p = 0.002). In addition, high NLR was distinctly related to worse OS in Asian people (p = 0.04) or operation (p = 0.04). High NLR was associated with shorter PFS and shorter OS in ovarian cancer. NLR is potentially a promising prognostic biomarker in patients with ovarian cancer.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.6061/clinics/2016(06)04
发表时间:
2016-07
期刊:
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Gong W;Yang S;Yang X;Guo F
通讯作者:
Guo F
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Tierney JF;Stewart LA;Ghersi D;Burdett S;Sydes MR
通讯作者:
Sydes MR
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Sanchez-Salcedo, Pablo;de-Torres, Juan P.;Zulueta, Javier J.
通讯作者:
Zulueta, Javier J.
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Kasuga J;Kawahara T;Takamoto D;Fukui S;Tokita T;Tadenuma T;Narahara M;Fusayasu S;Terao H;Izumi K;Ito H;Hattori Y;Teranishi J;Sasaki T;Makiyama K;Miyoshi Y;Yao M;Yumura Y;Miyamoto H;Uemura H
通讯作者:
Uemura H
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Nakamura K;Nagasaka T;Nishida T;Haruma T;Ogawa C;Kusumoto T;Seki N;Hiramatsu Y
通讯作者:
Hiramatsu Y