A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.
A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.025
复制
发表时间:
2012-04-05
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Sheehan FT
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Borotikar BS;Sipprell WH 3rd;Wible EE;Sheehan FT
Patellofemoral osteoarthritis and its potential precursor patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) are common, costly, and debilitating diseases. PFPS has been shown to be associated with altered patellofemoral joint mechanics; however, an actual variation in joint contact stresses has not been established due to challenges in accurately quantifying in vivo contact kinematics (area and location). This study developed and validated a method for tracking dynamic, in vivo cartilage contact kinematics by combining three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, cine-phase contrast (CPC), multi-plane cine (MPC), and 3D high-resolution static imaging. CPC and MPC data were acquired from 12 healthy volunteers while they actively extended/flexed their knee within the MRI scanner. Since no gold standard exists for the quantification of in vivo dynamic cartilage contact kinematics, the accuracy of tracking a single point (patellar origin relative to the femur) represented the accuracy of tracking the kinematics of an entire surface. The accuracy was determined by the average absolute error between the PF kinematics derived through registration of MPC images to a static model and those derived through integration of the CPC velocity data. The accuracy ranged from 0.47mm–0.77mm for the patella and femur and 0.68mm–0.86 mm for the patellofemoral joint. For purely quantifying joint kinematics, CPC remains an analytically simpler and more accurate (accuracy < 0.33mm) technique. However, for application requiring the tracking of an entire surface, such as quantifying cartilage contact kinematics, this combined imaging approach produces accurate results with minimal operator intervention.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
27.4
作者:
Thorstensson, C. A.;Andersson, M. L. E.;Petersson, I. F.
通讯作者:
Petersson, I. F.
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Utting, MR;Davies, G;Newman, JH
通讯作者:
Newman, JH
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Bey, Michael J;Kline, Stephanie K;Zauel, Roger
通讯作者:
Zauel, Roger
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Lin, Yi-Chung;Haftka, Raphael T.;Fregly, Benjamin J.
通讯作者:
Fregly, Benjamin J.
DOI:
10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00996.x
发表时间:
2010-10
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Boling M;Padua D;Marshall S;Guskiewicz K;Pyne S;Beutler A
通讯作者:
Beutler A