Comparing Compliance Behaviour of Students and Farmers. An Extra‐laboratory Experiment in the Context of Agri‐environmental Nudges in Germany

Comparing Compliance Behaviour of Students and Farmers. An Extra‐laboratory Experiment in the Context of Agri‐environmental Nudges in Germany
复制标题

比较学生和农民的合规行为 德国农业环境助推背景下的实验室外实验

DOI:
10.1111/1477-9552.12352
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Mußhoff
Mußhoff
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mußhoff

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

用于政策影响分析的经济实验越来越受欢迎,这导致了一场持续不断的辩论,即学生是否适合取代专业人士作为实验对象。迄今为止,农业和资源经济学实验中的受试者集合效应还没有得到充分的研究。为了识别学生和非学生之间的区别和相似之处,我们以适应农业环境背景的多阶段商业管理游戏的形式进行了实验。我们比较了德国农业学生和德国农民在水保护规则方面的遵守行为,并分析了他们对两种不同的绿色推动干预措施的反应。实验结果表明,对政策处理的反应方向是相似的。即使是意想不到的行为,也可以通过学生样本重现。然而,治疗效果的大小在两个样本之间有所不同。这意味着,农业和资源经济学领域的实验者可以利用学生的主题库来分析推动政策的方向。如果要对影响的大小做出预测,我们建议使用专业的受试者池。
Increasing popularity of economic experiments for policy impact analysis has led to an on‐going debate about the suitability of students to substitute professionals as experimental subjects. To date, subject pool effects in agricultural and resource economics experiments have not been sufficiently studied. In order to identify differences and similarities between students and non‐students, we carry out an experiment in the form of a multi‐period business management game that is adapted to an agri‐environmental context. We compare the compliance behaviour of German agricultural students and German farmers with regard to water protection rules and analyse their responses to two different green nudge interventions. The experimental results reveal that the direction of the response to the policy treatments is similar. Even unexpected behaviour could be reproduced by the student sample. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the treatment effects differed between the two samples. This implies that experimenters in the field of agricultural and resource economics could use the subject pool of students to analyse the direction of nudge policies. If predictions should be made about the magnitude effects, we suggest using a professional subject pool.
在风险引发任务中显示期望值:实验风险研究中信息的影响
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2017.1378246
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 5.1
作者:
Daniel Hermann;O. Musshoff
通讯作者: O. Musshoff
保护生态系统服务市场的空间显性利益:网络奖励和空间目标的实验测试
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aav061
发表时间: 2006
期刊: Environmental Economics eJournal
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Fooks;N. Higgins;K. Messer;J. Duke;Daniel Hellerstein;L. Lynch
通讯作者: L. Lynch
在行为研究中,学生真的是商人的糟糕替代品吗?
DOI: 10.1177/002224377000700416
发表时间: 1970
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
I. Khera;J. Benson
通讯作者: J. Benson
深入研究背景风险:对农民和学生进行的实验
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aar070
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
David H. Herberich;J. List
通讯作者: J. List
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00620.x
发表时间: 2014-07
期刊: SRPN: Developing World (Topic)
影响因子: --
作者:
Syster C. Maart-Noelck;O. Musshoff
通讯作者: Syster C. Maart-Noelck;O. Musshoff