Tryptase staining of mast cells may differentiate eosinophilic esophagitis from gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Tryptase staining of mast cells may differentiate eosinophilic esophagitis from gastroesophageal reflux disease.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2010.412
复制
发表时间:
2011-02
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Shaheen, Nicholas J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dellon, Evan S.;Chen, Xiaoxin;Miller, C. Ryan;Fritchie, Karen J.;Rubinas, Tara C.;Woosley, John T.;Shaheen, Nicholas J.
Mast cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but their role in diagnosis is unknown. Our aim was to determine whether tryptase staining of esophageal mast cells differentiates EoE from GERD and has utility for diagnosis of EoE. We performed a case-control study comparing patients with EoE, defined by consensus guidelines, to GERD patients with eosinophils on esophageal biopsy. Immunohistochemistry was performed with mast cell tryptase. The density (mast cells/mm2) and intensity (0–4 scale) of mast cell staining was compared between groups after masking the diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated to assess mast cell staining as both a stand-alone diagnostic test and an adjunctive assay with eosinophil counts. Fifty-four EoE (mean age: 24; 69% male; mean 146 eos/hpf) and 55 GERD (mean age 34; 60% male; mean 20 eos/hpf) patients were analyzed. The maximum epithelial tryptase density was higher in EoE than in GERD (162 ± 87 mast cells/mm2 vs 67 ± 54; p<0.001). Mast cells were diffusely distributed throughout the biopsy in more EoE than GERD patients (41% vs 7%; p<0.001). Tryptase density and eosinophil count were only weakly correlated (R2=0.09; p=0.002). The AUC was 0.84 for tryptase staining alone, and 0.96 for the combination of mast cells and eosinophils. Patients with EoE have higher levels of tryptase positive mast cells compared to GERD patients, improving the diagnostic value of biopsies beyond eosinophil counts alone. Mast cell tryptase may have utility as a diagnostic assay for EoE.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
14.2
作者:
Abonia, J. Pablo;Blanchard, Carine;Butz, Bridget Buckmeier;Rainey, Heather F.;Collins, Margaret H.;Stringer, Keith;Putnam, Philip E.;Rothenberg, Marc E.
通讯作者:
Rothenberg, Marc E.
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Ngo, P;Furuta, GT;Fox, VL
通讯作者:
Fox, VL
DOI:
10.1097/01.mpg.0000188740.38757.d2
发表时间:
2006-01-01
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Gupta, SK;Fitzgerald, JF;HogenEsch, T
通讯作者:
HogenEsch, T
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Mueller, S.;Neureiter, D.;Stolte, M.
通讯作者:
Stolte, M.
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Rodrigo, Sonall;Abboud, Gebran;Chandrasoma, Parakrama
通讯作者:
Chandrasoma, Parakrama