Machine learning prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: 2D versus 3D radiomic features.
Machine learning prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: 2D versus 3D radiomic features.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mp.14538
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Wu S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arefan D;Chai R;Sun M;Zuley ML;Wu S
The purpose of this study was to distinguish axillary lymph node (ALN) status using preoperative breast DCE-MRI radiomics and compare the effects of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analysis. A retrospective study including 154 breast cancer patients all confirmed by pathology; 80 with ALN metastasis and 74 without. All MRI scans were achieved at a 3.0 Tesla scanner with 7 post-contrast MR phases sequentially acquired with a temporal resolution of 60 s. MRI radiomic features were extracted separately from a 2D single slice (i.e., the representative slice) and the 3D tumor volume. Several machine learning classifiers were built and compared using 2D or 3D analysis to distinguish positive vs negative ALN status. We performed independent test and 10-fold cross validation with multiple repetitions, and used bootstrap test, least absolute shrinkage selection operator, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis as statistical tests. The highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.81 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.80–0.83) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81–0.82) for 2D and 3D analysis, respectively; the corresponding accuracy was 79% and 80%. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier achieved the highest classification performance. None of the AUC differences between 2D and 3D analysis was statistically significant for the several tested machine learning classifiers (all P> 0.05). Radiomic features from segmented tumor region in breast MRI were associated with ALN status. The separate radiomic analysis on 3D tumor volume showed a similar effect to the 2D analysis on the single representative slice in the tested machine learning classifiers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Yamamoto, Shota;Han, Wonshik;Kuo, Michael D.
通讯作者:
Kuo, Michael D.
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Zhou, Yuanping;Shi, Changqin;Jimenez, Giorgos
通讯作者:
Jimenez, Giorgos
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
van Griethuysen JJM;Fedorov A;Parmar C;Hosny A;Aucoin N;Narayan V;Beets-Tan RGH;Fillion-Robin JC;Pieper S;Aerts HJWL
通讯作者:
Aerts HJWL
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Murray, AD;Staff, RT;Payne, S
通讯作者:
Payne, S
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Li H;Zhu Y;Burnside ES;Drukker K;Hoadley KA;Fan C;Conzen SD;Whitman GJ;Sutton EJ;Net JM;Ganott M;Huang E;Morris EA;Perou CM;Ji Y;Giger ML
通讯作者:
Giger ML