Exploring the Performance Consequences of Target Prevalence and Ecological Display Designs When Using an Automated Aid
Exploring the Performance Consequences of Target Prevalence and Ecological Display Designs When Using an Automated Aid
复制标题
探索使用自动辅助设备时目标流行率和生态展示设计的性能后果
DOI：
10.1007/s42113-021-00104-3
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bennett, Kevin B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kneeland, Cara M.;Houpt, Joseph W.;Bennett, Kevin B.
人类操作员在接受自动辅助设备的帮助时不一定比没有自动辅助设备时表现得更好。当前的工作探讨了在低流行条件下将自动化援助与任务信息相结合的影响。具体来说，我们比较了自动辅助与一般任务信息或其他视觉决策支持辅助集成的显示。受试者在自动辅助设备的帮助下执行快速判断任务，显示类型、难度和普遍程度各不相同。结果表明，与没有自动化相比，参与者的执行效率较低，并且视觉决策支持在响应时间方面没有带来额外的好处。与不支持相比，这两个决定都支持提高参与者的敏感性，这可能有利于削弱低流行率效应的表现后果。出乎意料的是，我们发现参与者在每次展示中的表现很大程度上取决于他们体验每次展示的时间。参与者可能会使用一种策略来补充一种显示而不是另一种显示，具体取决于他们首先看到的情况。自动化辅助设备可用于现实世界，以减轻低目标患病率的影响；然而，其有效性可能取决于其他接口的经验。
Human operators do not necessarily perform better when receiving assistance from an automated aid than without the automated aid. The current work explored the impact of integrating the automated aid with the task information in low prevalence conditions. Specifically, we compared displays where the automated aid was integrated with task information in general or with another visual decision support aid. Subjects performed a speeded judgment task with the assistance of an automated aid, varying in display type, difficulty, and prevalence. Results indicated that participants performed less efficiently with the automated relative to without and that there was no added benefit of the visual decision support in terms of response times. Both decision supports improved participant’s sensitivity over no support, which may be beneficial for weakening the performance consequences of the low prevalence effect. Unexpectedly, we found that participants’ performance with each display was strongly dependent on when they experienced each display. It is possible that participants might be using strategies that complement one display over another, depending on the condition they see first. Automated aids could be used in real-world contexts to alleviate the effects of low target prevalence; however, the effectiveness may depend on experience with other interfaces.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1518/001872095779049408
发表时间：
1995-09
期刊：
Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
影响因子：
--
作者：
C. Wickens;C. Carswell
通讯作者：
C. Wickens;C. Carswell
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Horowitz, Todd S.
通讯作者：
Horowitz, Todd S.
人类自动化团队绩效的评估函数分析：对 Yamani 和 McCarley (2018) 数据的重新分析
DOI：
10.1177/1541931218621348
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
影响因子：
--
作者：
Cara M. Zinn;Yusuke Yamani;Joseph W. Houpt;Sidney T. Scott
通讯作者：
Sidney T. Scott
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
J. Townsend;Nicholas A. Altieri
通讯作者：
J. Townsend;Nicholas A. Altieri
低流行度视觉搜索中的颜色和空间提示
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
N. Russell;Melina A. Kunar
通讯作者：
Melina A. Kunar