Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pelargonic acid (nonanoic acid).

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pelargonic acid (nonanoic acid).
复制标题

DOI:
10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6813
复制
发表时间:
2021-08
期刊:
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Villamar-Bouza L
Villamar-Bouza L
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA);Alvarez F;Arena M;Auteri D;Borroto J;Brancato A;Carrasco Cabrera L;Castoldi AF;Chiusolo A;Colagiorgi A;Colas M;Crivellente F;De Lentdecker C;Egsmose M;Fait G;Gouliarmou V;Ferilli F;Greco L;Ippolito A;Istace F;Jarrah S;Kardassi D;Kienzler A;Leuschner R;Lava R;Linguadoca A;Lythgo C;Magrans O;Mangas I;Miron I;Molnar T;Padovani L;Parra Morte JM;Pedersen R;Reich H;Santos M;Sharp R;Szentes C;Terron A;Tiramani M;Vagenende B;Villamar-Bouza L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

报告员成员国希腊和联合报告员成员国奥地利的主管当局对农药活性物质壬酸(壬酸)进行的初步风险评估进行同行评审后,欧洲食品安全局得出了结论,并报告了将该物质纳入第 396/2005 号法规附件 IV 的考虑因素。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例 (EU) 第 844/2012 号所要求的,并经委员会实施条例 (EU) 第 2018/1659 号修订。这些结论是基于对壬酸作为除草剂在葡萄园、土豆、小路和有木本植物的地方、观赏灌木、观赏草坪、家庭花园和土地、小路和有树木生长的开放区域、木本观赏植物、装饰性草坪、草坪(田间使用)的代表性用途的评估而得出的。提出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了尚未最终确定的评估以及监管框架要求的缺失信息。
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Austria, for the pesticide active substance pelargonic acid (nonanoic acid) and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of pelargonic acid as a herbicide on vineyards, potatoes, paths and places with woody plants, ornamental shrubs, ornamentals lawn, home gardens and allotments, paths and open areas with tree growth, woody ornamentals, decorative lawns, turf (field use). The reliable end points appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Assessments not finalised and missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework are listed.
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2665
发表时间: 2012-04-01
期刊: EFSA JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Boesten, Jos;Bolognesi, Claudia;Vleminckx, Christiane
通讯作者: Vleminckx, Christiane
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295
发表时间: 2013-07-01
期刊: EFSA JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3290
发表时间: 2013-07-01
期刊: EFSA JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Aagaard, Alf;Brock, Theo;Van der Linden, Ton
通讯作者: Van der Linden, Ton
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3874
发表时间: 2014-10-01
期刊: EFSA JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1496
发表时间: 2010-01-01
期刊: EFSA JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
通讯作者: --