Evidence of inconsistent results using current eye tracking glance and visit analysis standards
Evidence of inconsistent results using current eye tracking glance and visit analysis standards
复制标题
使用当前眼动追踪扫视和访问分析标准得出不一致结果的证据
DOI:
10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103951
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
10.3
通讯作者:
Goodrum, Paul
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sears, Matthew;Alruwaythi, Omar;Goodrum, Paul
Eye tracking glance analyses have been used to study the behavior of motor vehicle drivers for at least two decades and eye tracking is now emerging as an experimental protocol in construction research. Previous studies have identified relationships between driver glance behavior and performance, so existing motor vehicle driver glance analysis methods were applied to search for analogous relationships with construction craftworkers during a model assembly task. Eye tracking analysis software vendors have yet to adopt standardized eye tracking event detection algorithms, and researchers have historically reported insufficient details to render most eye tracking analyses reproducible. As a result, the purpose of the present work is to address the gap in knowledge in understanding the challenges encountered as a result of a lack of standardization. The methodology applied existing glance analysis methods to a study incorporating mobile eye tracking glasses, which made the experimental environment less controlled than a typical glance analysis study using a screen-based eye tracking system, such as a motor vehicle driver behavior study. A new noise filtering parameter, maximum off-stimulus fixations, was also introduced. The results show that the absence of standardized eye tracking parameters, such as minimum fixation duration, can lead to different statistical results. The study's primary contribution to the body of knowledge is that is identifies the need for standardization of eye tracking analyses to better ensure that future eye tracking studies be more consistent and reproducible.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Bowden;A. Dorr;T. Thorpe;C. Anumba
通讯作者:
C. Anumba
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Isac;R. Pellerin;Pierre
通讯作者:
Pierre
DOI:
10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000812
发表时间:
2019-03-01
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
Ergan, Semiha;Radwan, Ahmed;Han, Xue
通讯作者:
Han, Xue
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
P. Utting
通讯作者:
P. Utting
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Neill;D. Hurwitz;M. Olsen
通讯作者:
M. Olsen