Alternative Information Signs: Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention

Alternative Information Signs: Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention
复制标题

替代信息标志:驾驶员理解力和视觉注意力的评估

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Olsen
M. Olsen
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Neill;D. Hurwitz;M. Olsen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要交通标志的有效性受标志的可理解性、易读性距离、一眼易读性和可学习性的共同影响;然而,可理解性已被反复确定为最重要的有效性措施之一。本研究通过演示和比较各种在线调查问题和沉浸式驾驶模拟任务,为评估交通标志可理解性提供了最佳实践。这些技术被应用到评估的可理解性的五个替代旅游信息(TI)的迹象在俄勒冈州。几个TI标志的替代品首先在一个有142名参与者的在线调查中进行了测试,然后在俄勒冈州州立大学驾驶模拟器中对42名参与者进行了更真实的测试。95.7%的驾驶模拟器受试者正确理解了Sign INFO。其他测试模式也获得了类似的结果。值得注意的是,TI符号替代品的可理解性,包括版本(75.4%)和...
AbstractThe effectiveness of a traffic sign is collectively influenced by the sign’s understandability, legibility distance, glance legibility, and learnability; however, understandability has been repeatedly identified as one of the most important effectiveness measures. This study contributes to best practices for evaluating traffic sign understandability by demonstrating and comparing a variety of online survey questions and immersive driving simulation tasks. These techniques were applied to assess the understandability of five alternative tourist information (TI) signs in Oregon. Several TI sign alternatives were first tested in an online survey with 142 participants, followed by more authentic testing of 42 participants in the Oregon State University Driving Simulator. Sign INFO was correctly understood by 95.7% of the driving simulator subjects. Similar results were obtained for the other testing modalities. Notably, the understandability of TI sign alternatives, including versions with (75.4%) and...
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.022
发表时间: 2010-05-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Konstantopoulos, Panos;Chapman, Peter;Crundall, David
通讯作者: Crundall, David