Travel Mode Choice Modeling: A Comparison of Bayesian Networks and Neural Networks
Travel Mode Choice Modeling: A Comparison of Bayesian Networks and Neural Networks
复制标题
出行方式选择建模:贝叶斯网络和神经网络的比较
DOI:
10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.209-211.717
复制
发表时间:
2012-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tang Dounan, Yang Min, Zhang Meihui
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tang Dounan, Yang Min, Zhang Meihui
In recent years, Bayesian networks and neural networks have been widely applied to the travel demand prediction area. However, their prediction performance is rarely directly compared. By experimental tests conducted using the same dataset, a Bayesian network model and a neural network model are compared for the travel mode analysis for the first time in this paper. It is found that the fully Bayesian network model tends to overfit the training set when the network itself is considerable complicated. The TAN structure otherwise has a better generalization performance and can achieve a better and more stable prediction performance, for its prediction accuracy 75.4%±0.63%, compared to the BP neural network model ,which prediction accuracy is 72.2%±3.01%. Experiment and statistical tests demonstrate the superiority of Bayesian networks and we propose using Bayesian networks, especially TAN, instead of neural networks in the travel mode choice prediction field.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6
作者:
R. Hecht-Nielsen
通讯作者:
R. Hecht-Nielsen
DOI:
10.1109/ijcnn.2000.860810
发表时间:
2000-07
期刊:
Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Dantas;Koshi Yamamoto;M. V. Lamar;Y. Yamashita
通讯作者:
A. Dantas;Koshi Yamamoto;M. V. Lamar;Y. Yamashita
影响因子:
29.4
作者:
M. Ramoni;P. Sebastiani
通讯作者:
P. Sebastiani
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
John A. Hertz
通讯作者:
John A. Hertz
影响因子:
4
作者:
R. Neapolitan
通讯作者:
R. Neapolitan