Exploring multiple dimensions of values and valuing: a conceptual framework for mapping and translating values for social-ecological research and practice
Exploring multiple dimensions of values and valuing: a conceptual framework for mapping and translating values for social-ecological research and practice
复制标题
探索价值观和价值评估的多个维度：为社会生态研究和实践绘制和转化价值观的概念框架
DOI：
10.1007/s11625-018-0639-1
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
K. Williams
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Rawluk;R. Ford;Nerida M. Anderson;K. Williams
社会价值观是复杂的社会生态挑战的基础，例如可持续性。然而，有许多方法来概念化价值观和估价，这种分歧限制了跨研究学科的对话，阻碍了将价值观实际纳入可持续发展决策。在理解价值本质的不同和支离破碎的方式中，我们确定了两个关键的紧张关系：背景依赖性和抽象程度。我们考虑这些紧张关系如何适用于与理解社会生态系统对人们的重要性相关的广泛概念，包括有价值的属性和资产、文化价值以及与地方的联系。我们提出了一个由这些张力构成的概念框架，以定位相互关联的多种价值概念。我们提出的概念框架在本体论上是多元的，在认识论上是灵活的，提供了一个框架，用于跨不同级别的抽象和上下文依赖映射价值概念。该框架提供了一种跨越价值概念广度的手段，并作为促进跨学科对话的起点。我们讨论了该框架对从事多种理论传统的研究人员的影响，以及对如何理解什么对社区重要的实践者的影响。
Social values underpin complex social-ecological challenges, such as sustainability. However, there are many ways of conceptualising values and valuing, and this divergence limits conversations across research disciplines, hindering the practical incorporation of values into sustainability decision making. We identify two key tensions in the disparate and fragmented ways of understanding the nature of values: context dependence and level of abstractness. We consider how these tensions apply across a breadth of concepts relevant to understanding the importance of socio-ecological systems to people, including valued attributes and assets, cultural values, and connection to place. We propose a conceptual framework structured by these tensions to orient multiple value concepts in relation to each other. We present the conceptual framework as being ontologically plural, and epistemologically flexible, providing a framework for mapping value concepts across different levels of abstractness and context dependency. The framework offers a means to span the breadth of value concepts and acts as a starting point for fostering cross-disciplinary conversations. We discuss the implications of the framework for researchers engaging with multiple theoretical traditions, as well as for practitioners grappling with how to make sense of what is important to the communities.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Fish, Robert;Church, Andrew;Winter, Michael
通讯作者：
Winter, Michael
应对丛林火灾风险：变革性适应的必要性
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
O'Neill S
通讯作者：
O'Neill S