Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.
Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmj.n1088
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-13
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ramsay M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lopez Bernal J;Andrews N;Gower C;Robertson C;Stowe J;Tessier E;Simmons R;Cottrell S;Roberts R;O'Doherty M;Brown K;Cameron C;Stockton D;McMenamin J;Ramsay M
To estimate the real world effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S vaccines against confirmed covid-19 symptoms (including the UK variant of concern B.1.1.7), admissions to hospital, and deaths. Test negative case-control study. Community testing for covid-19 in England. 156 930 adults aged 70 years and older who reported symptoms of covid-19 between 8 December 2020 and 19 February 2021 and were successfully linked to vaccination data in the National Immunisation Management System. Vaccination with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-S. Primary outcomes were polymerase chain reaction confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, admissions to hospital for covid-19, and deaths with covid-19. Participants aged 80 years and older vaccinated with BNT162b2 before 4 January 2021 had a higher odds of testing positive for covid-19 in the first nine days after vaccination (odds ratio up to 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 1.77), indicating that those initially targeted had a higher underlying risk of infection. Vaccine effectiveness was therefore compared with the baseline post-vaccination period. Vaccine effects were noted 10 to 13 days after vaccination, reaching a vaccine effectiveness of 70% (95% confidence interval 59% to 78%), then plateauing. From 14 days after the second dose a vaccination effectiveness of 89% (85% to 93%) was found compared with the increased baseline risk. Participants aged 70 years and older vaccinated from 4 January (when ChAdOx1-S delivery commenced) had a similar underlying risk of covid-19 to unvaccinated individuals. With BNT162b2, vaccine effectiveness reached 61% (51% to 69%) from 28 to 34 days after vaccination, then plateaued. With ChAdOx1-S, effects were seen from 14 to 20 days after vaccination, reaching an effectiveness of 60% (41% to 73%) from 28 to 34 days, increasing to 73% (27% to 90%) from day 35 onwards. On top of the protection against symptomatic disease, a further 43% (33% to 52%) reduced risk of emergency hospital admission and 51% (37% to 62%) reduced risk of death was observed in those who had received one dose of BNT162b2. Participants who had received one dose of ChAdOx1-S had a further 37% (3% to 59%) reduced risk of emergency hospital admission. Follow-up was insufficient to assess the effect of ChAdOx1-S on mortality. Combined with the effect against symptomatic disease, a single dose of either vaccine was about 80% effective at preventing admission to hospital with covid-19 and a single dose of BNT162b2 was 85% effective at preventing death with covid-19. Vaccination with either one dose of BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-S was associated with a significant reduction in symptomatic covid-19 in older adults, and with further protection against severe disease. Both vaccines showed similar effects. Protection was maintained for the duration of follow-up (>6 weeks). A second dose of BNT162b2 was associated with further protection against symptomatic disease. A clear effect of the vaccines against the B.1.1.7 variant was found.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
19
作者:
Singanayagam, Anika;Patel, Monika;Gopal, Robin
通讯作者:
Gopal, Robin
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32661-1
发表时间:
2021-01-09
期刊:
Lancet (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Voysey M;Clemens SAC;Madhi SA;Weckx LY;Folegatti PM;Aley PK;Angus B;Baillie VL;Barnabas SL;Bhorat QE;Bibi S;Briner C;Cicconi P;Collins AM;Colin-Jones R;Cutland CL;Darton TC;Dheda K;Duncan CJA;Emary KRW;Ewer KJ;Fairlie L;Faust SN;Feng S;Ferreira DM;Finn A;Goodman AL;Green CM;Green CA;Heath PT;Hill C;Hill H;Hirsch I;Hodgson SHC;Izu A;Jackson S;Jenkin D;Joe CCD;Kerridge S;Koen A;Kwatra G;Lazarus R;Lawrie AM;Lelliott A;Libri V;Lillie PJ;Mallory R;Mendes AVA;Milan EP;Minassian AM;McGregor A;Morrison H;Mujadidi YF;Nana A;O'Reilly PJ;Padayachee SD;Pittella A;Plested E;Pollock KM;Ramasamy MN;Rhead S;Schwarzbold AV;Singh N;Smith A;Song R;Snape MD;Sprinz E;Sutherland RK;Tarrant R;Thomson EC;Török ME;Toshner M;Turner DPJ;Vekemans J;Villafana TL;Watson MEE;Williams CJ;Douglas AD;Hill AVS;Lambe T;Gilbert SC;Pollard AJ;Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group
通讯作者:
Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2034577
发表时间:
2020-12-31
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Polack FP;Thomas SJ;Kitchin N;Absalon J;Gurtman A;Lockhart S;Perez JL;Pérez Marc G;Moreira ED;Zerbini C;Bailey R;Swanson KA;Roychoudhury S;Koury K;Li P;Kalina WV;Cooper D;Frenck RW Jr;Hammitt LL;Türeci Ö;Nell H;Schaefer A;Ünal S;Tresnan DB;Mather S;Dormitzer PR;Şahin U;Jansen KU;Gruber WC;C4591001 Clinical Trial Group
通讯作者:
C4591001 Clinical Trial Group
影响因子:
19
作者:
Pebody, Richard;Djennad, Abdelmajid;Zambon, Maria
通讯作者:
Zambon, Maria
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Schwartz LM;Halloran ME;Rowhani-Rahbar A;Neuzil KM;Victor JC
通讯作者:
Victor JC