A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method.
A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11205-010-9578-7
复制
发表时间：
2010-11
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Steptoe A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dockray S;Grant N;Stone AA;Kahneman D;Wardle J;Steptoe A
日常生活中情感状态的测量对于许多类型的生活质量、健康和心理学研究至关重要。生态瞬时评估（EMA）是公认的选择方法，但受访者的负担可能很高。日重建方法 (DRM) 由 Kahneman 及其同事开发（Science, 2004, 306, 1776–1780），用于评估日常生活中的情感、活动和时间使用。我们试图通过在工作和休闲日监测的 94 名职业女性样本中与同期 EMA 评级进行比较来验证 DRM 影响评级。每 24 小时内获得幸福、疲劳、压力和愤怒/沮丧的 6 个 EMA 评级，并与当天结束时回顾记录的同一小时的 DRM 评级进行比较。使用这两种技术记录了相似的情感强度分布。经衰减调整后的人与人之间的相关性范围为 0.58（压力、工作日）至 0.90（幸福感、休闲日）。关联的强度与年龄、教育程度或抑郁情绪无关。我们得出的结论是，DRM 提供了对一天中影响强度和影响变化的相当可靠的估计，因此是衡量健康和社会研究中日常经验的宝贵工具。
Measurement of affective states in everyday life is of fundamental importance in many types of quality of life, health, and psychological research. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is the recognized method of choice, but the respondent burden can be high. The day reconstruction method (DRM) was developed by Kahneman and colleagues (Science, 2004, 306, 1776–1780) to assess affect, activities and time use in everyday life. We sought to validate DRM affect ratings by comparison with contemporaneous EMA ratings in a sample of 94 working women monitored over work and leisure days. Six EMA ratings of happiness, tiredness, stress, and anger/frustration were obtained over each 24 h period, and were compared with DRM ratings for the same hour, recorded retrospectively at the end of the day. Similar profiles of affect intensity were recorded with the two techniques. The between-person correlations adjusted for attenuation ranged from 0.58 (stress, working day) to 0.90 (happiness, leisure day). The strength of associations was not related to age, educational attainment, or depressed mood. We conclude that the DRM provides reasonably reliable estimates both of the intensity of affect and variations in affect over the day, so is a valuable instrument for the measurement of everyday experience in health and social research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
Krueger, Alan B.;Schkade, David A.
通讯作者：
Schkade, David A.
影响因子：
168.9
作者：
Krueger, Alan B.;Stone, Arthur A.
通讯作者：
Stone, Arthur A.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Ross, Catherine E.;Mirowsky, John
通讯作者：
Mirowsky, John
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Peeters, Frenk;Berkhof, Johannes;Nicolson, Nancy A.
通讯作者：
Nicolson, Nancy A.
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
White, Mathew P.;Dolan, Paul
通讯作者：
Dolan, Paul