Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology.
Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of Personality Pathology.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10862-009-9130-8
复制
发表时间：
2009-12
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Oltmanns, Thomas F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Okada, Mayumi;Oltmanns, Thomas F.
研究了人格病理学三种测量方法，人格诊断问卷-4+ (PDQ-4+)、DSM-IV轴II型人格障碍问卷（SCID-IIQ）和多源人格病理学评估（MAPP）的趋同水平。在连续9个工作日内，以交替顺序对大学生样本进行三次问卷调查。这三种工具之间有一定程度的趋同，但它们之间也存在实质性的经验差异。数据显示了三个相关的结论：(1)总体而言，自我报告版本的MAPP比其他两份问卷更保守；(2)这两份问卷不应被视为相同结构的可互换测量；(3)所提供的测量宽度随问卷和被测量的具体人格障碍而变化。
Levels of convergence among three measures of personality pathology, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders Questionnaire (SCID-IIQ) and the Multi-source Assessment of Personality Pathology (MAPP) were examined. Each questionnaire was administered three times in an alternating sequence over nine consecutive weekdays to a sample of college students. There was some degree of convergence among the three instruments, but there were also substantial empirical differences between them. The data suggest three related conclusions: (1) in general, the self-report version of the MAPP is more conservative than the other two questionnaires, (2) these questionnaires should not be considered interchangeable measures of the same constructs, and (3) the breadth of measurement provided varies as a function of both the questionnaire and the specific personality disorder being measured.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Davison, S;Leese, M;Taylor, PJ
通讯作者：
Taylor, PJ
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
EKSELIUS, L;LINDSTROM, E;KULLGREN, G
通讯作者：
KULLGREN, G
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Oltmanns, TF;Turkheimer, E;Strauss, ME
通讯作者：
Strauss, ME
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
JACOBSBERG, L;PERRY, S;FRANCES, A
通讯作者：
FRANCES, A
影响因子：
--
作者：
Torgersen, S;Kringlen, E;Cramer, V
通讯作者：
Cramer, V