On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: Evidence from simple and selective stopping
On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: Evidence from simple and selective stopping
复制标题
关于反应抑制和负启动之间的区别：来自简单和选择性停止的证据
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Vandierendonck
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Verbruggen;B. Liefooghe;A. Vandierendonck
在有关抑制的研究中，负启动是一种常见的后遗症。前一次试验的效果也在其他范式中发现，比如停车信号范式。本研究在负启动范式中引入了停止信号，并探讨了停止信号抑制与负启动的关系。在实验1中，我们使用了一个简单的停止信号任务。停止数据清楚地表明，停止绩效不受负面启动的影响。有趣的是，在无信号探针上，在初级试验中成功抑制反应后，负启动效应消失。相反，当抑制失败时，负启动效应仍然存在。在实验2中，我们使用了选择性停车信号任务。与实验1一样，负启动对运动反应的抑制没有影响。在本实验中证实了负启动是由于一般的非特异性停止而消失的假设，因为在成功和不成功的行为抑制之后都发现了负启动效应。这两个实验的结果都表明，反应抑制不受负启动的影响，而负启动只有在成功的一般停止后才会受到影响。
Negative priming is a commonly observed after-effect in studies concerning inhibition. Effects of the preceding trial are also found in other paradigms, like the stop signal paradigm. In the present study, stop signals were introduced in a negative priming paradigm and the relation between stop signal inhibition and negative priming was investigated. In Experiment 1, we used a simple stop signal task. Stopping data clearly suggest that stopping performance was not influenced by negative priming. Interestingly, on no-signal probes the negative priming effect disappeared after successful inhibition of the response on the prime trial. On the contrary, when inhibition failed, the negative priming effect remained. In Experiment 2, we used the selective stop signal task. As in Experiment 1, inhibition of motor responses was not influenced by negative priming. The hypothesis that negative priming disappeared due to a general nonspecific stop was confirmed in this experiment, as a negative priming effect was found after both successful and unsuccessful behavioral inhibition. The results of both experiments show that response inhibition is not influenced by negative priming, and that negative priming is only affected after a successful general stop.
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.498
发表时间：
1995-06-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
DEJONG, R;COLES, MGH;LOGAN, GD
通讯作者：
LOGAN, GD
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Mayr, U;Keele, SW
通讯作者：
Keele, SW