Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study.
Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/annonc/mdy121
复制
发表时间:
2018-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Wolf J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Novello S;Mazières J;Oh IJ;de Castro J;Migliorino MR;Helland Å;Dziadziuszko R;Griesinger F;Kotb A;Zeaiter A;Cardona A;Balas B;Johannsdottir HK;Das-Gupta A;Wolf J
This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08–0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17–0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3–4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks). Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Solomon, Benjamin J.;Mok, Tony;Waqar, S.
通讯作者:
Waqar, S.
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Peters, Solange;Camidge, D. Ross;Mok, Tony
通讯作者:
Mok, Tony
DOI:
10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00488-x
发表时间:
2016-02
期刊:
The Lancet. Oncology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Shaw AT;Gandhi L;Gadgeel S;Riely GJ;Cetnar J;West H;Camidge DR;Socinski MA;Chiappori A;Mekhail T;Chao BH;Borghaei H;Gold KA;Zeaiter A;Bordogna W;Balas B;Puig O;Henschel V;Ou SI;study investigators
通讯作者:
study investigators
影响因子:
51.1
作者:
Shaw, Alice T.;Kim, Tae Min;Felip, Enriqueta
通讯作者:
Felip, Enriqueta
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Costa, Daniel B.;Shaw, Alice T.;Crino, Lucio
通讯作者:
Crino, Lucio