U-shaped relationship between platelet-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.

U-shaped relationship between platelet-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.
复制标题

A型急性主动脉夹层患者血小板淋巴细胞比值与术后院内死亡率的U型关系

DOI:
10.1186/s12872-021-02391-x
复制
发表时间:
2021-11-30
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Li N
Li N
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xie X;Fu X;Zhang Y;Huang W;Huang L;Deng Y;Yan D;Yao R;Li N

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

血小板-淋巴细胞比率(PLR)是一种新的炎症标志物,通常与院内死亡风险增加相关。我们的目的是调查PLR与A型急性主动脉夹层(AAAD)患者术后住院死亡风险之间的关系。 将2014年1月至2019年5月在中南大学湘雅医院接受AAAD急诊手术的患者(n = 270)分为三个基于PLR的三分之一。我们使用多元回归分析来评估PLR对住院死亡率的独立影响,并使用平滑曲线拟合和调整混杂因素的分段回归模型来分析PLR与住院死亡风险之间的阈值效应。总的术后住院死亡率为13.33%。调整混杂因素后,中PLR三分位数的院内死亡风险最低(比值比[OR] = 0.20,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.06-0.66)。在平滑样条拟合后,我们观察到PLR和住院死亡风险之间的U形关系。当PLR < 108时,PLR每降低1个单位,住院死亡风险增加10%(OR = 0.90,P = 0.001)。当PLR在108 ~ 188之间时,死亡风险最低(OR = 1.02,P = 0.288)。当PLR > 188时,PLR每增加1个单位,住院死亡风险增加6%(OR = 1.06,P = 0.045)。AAAD患者的PLR与住院死亡率之间存在U形关系,最低住院死亡风险的最佳PLR范围为108-188。PLR可能是预测AAAD患者院内死亡风险的有用术前预后工具,并可确保风险分层和早期治疗启动。
The platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), a novel inflammatory marker, is generally associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk. We aimed to investigate the association between PLR and postoperative in-hospital mortality risk in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). Patients (n = 270) who underwent emergency surgery for AAAD at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between January 2014 and May 2019 were divided into three PLR-based tertiles. We used multiple regression analyses to evaluate the independent effect of PLR on in-hospital mortality, and smooth curve fitting and a segmented regression model with adjustment of confounding factors to analyze the threshold effect between PLR and in-hospital mortality risk. The overall postoperative in-hospital mortality was 13.33%. After adjusting for confounders, in-hospital mortality risk in the medium PLR tertile was the lowest (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06–0.66). We observed a U-shaped relationship between PLR and in-hospital mortality risk after smoothing spline fitting was applied. When PLR < 108, the in-hospital mortality risk increased by 10% per unit decrease in PLR (OR = 0.90, P = 0.001). When the PLR was between 108 and 188, the mortality risk was the lowest (OR = 1.02, P = 0.288). When PLR > 188, the in-hospital mortality risk increased by 6% per unit increase in PLR (OR = 1.06, P = 0.045). There was a U-shaped relationship between PLR and in-hospital mortality in patients with AAAD, with an optimal PLR range for the lowest in-hospital mortality risk of 108–188. PLR may be a useful preoperative prognostic tool for predicting in-hospital mortality risk in patients with AAAD and can ensure risk stratification and early treatment initiation.
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.019
发表时间: 2021-03-19
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Helgason, Dadi;Helgadottir, Solveig;Gudbjartsson, Tomas
通讯作者: Gudbjartsson, Tomas
DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00187
发表时间: 2019-01-01
影响因子: 1.3
作者:
Li, Shuwen;Lu, Jiakai;Jin, Mu
通讯作者: Jin, Mu
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281
发表时间: 2014-11-01
影响因子: 39.3
作者:
Erbel, Raimund;Aboyans, Victor;Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
通讯作者: Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.05.021
发表时间: 2015-09
期刊: Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC
影响因子: --
作者:
Xia L;Li JH;Zhao K;Wu HY
通讯作者: Wu HY
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s141760
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Yao C;Liu X;Tang Z
通讯作者: Tang Z