The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists
The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: A comparison of DRM and categorized lists
复制标题
研究和测试中注意力分散对错误识别的影响：DRM 和分类列表的比较
作者：
Lauren M. Knott;S. Dewhurst
三个实验研究了编码和检索时注意力分散对错误识别的影响。在实验 1 中，参与者在全注意力或分散注意力（随机数生成）条件下研究单词列表，然后全神贯注地参加识别测试。在实验2中，在全神贯注地学习单词列表后，参与者进行了全神贯注或分散注意力的识别测试。实验 3 在学习和测试中操纵注意力。我们还比较了 Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) 和分类列表，因为最近关于此类列表产生的错误记忆轨迹的说法（Smith、Gerkens、Pierce 和 Choi，2002）。对于这两种列表类型，错误的“记住”反应会因编码时的注意力分散而减少，并因检索时的注意力分散而增加。研究结果表明，错误记忆的产生是由于编码时产生关联以及源监控检索失败的结果。至关重要的是，对于 DRM 和分类列表都是如此。
Three experiments investigated the effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on false recognition. In Experiment 1, participants studied word lists in either full or divided attention (random number generation) conditions and then took part in a recognition test with full attention. In Experiment 2, after studying word lists with full attention, participants carried out a recognition test with either full or divided attention. Experiment 3 manipulated attention at both study and test. We also compared Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) and categorized lists, due to recent claims regarding the locus of false memories produced by such lists (Smith, Gerkens, Pierce, & Choi, 2002). With both list types, false “remember” responses were reduced by divided attention at encoding and increased by divided attention at retrieval. The findings suggest that the production of false memories occurs as a result of the generation of associates at encoding and failures of source monitoring retrieval. Crucially, this is true for both DRM and categorized lists.
影响因子：
56.9
作者：
Brewer, JB;Zhao, Z;Gabrieli, JDE
通讯作者：
Gabrieli, JDE