The relevance and impact of business schools: In search of a holistic view

The relevance and impact of business schools: In search of a holistic view
复制标题

商学院的相关性和影响:寻求整体观点

DOI:
10.1111/ijmr.12312
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Redgrave S
Redgrave S
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Redgrave S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

商学院对社会的相关性和影响力的程度一直存在争议。从事所谓的“相关性问题”的批评者认为,商学院专注于学术严谨,而牺牲了实际相关性,导致缺乏社会影响力。这篇系统的文献综述综合了与商学院的相关性和影响力有关的零散知识。感谢这两个研究和教育的贡献,这篇评论提供了一个整体的观点,承认商学院的多维性。基于对266篇期刊论文的分析,我们提出了这一领域的四个主要文献流。我们发现研究和教育讨论之间的交叉受精的证据有限。然而,通过承认应用多维透镜研究商学院的贡献,我们开发了一个整体的主题框架,为未来提供理论方向。利用这一点,我们展示了推进商学院文献的四种途径。首先,我们强调了从制度逻辑的角度来看待商学院的潜力。其次,我们提出了一个新的建议,了解研究和教育之间的桥梁。第三,在考虑商学院如何在研究和教育中与利益相关者互动时,我们强调应用价值共创理论透镜。最后,我们提出了一个全面的以利益相关者为中心的相关和有影响力的知识的定义,并倡导这种包容性的定义,从概念上弥合研究和教育的分散讨论。
The degree to which business schools are relevant and impactful for society has been disputed. Critics that engage in the so‐called ‘relevance problem’ have argued that business schools are preoccupied with academic rigour at the expense of practical relevance, resulting in a lack of societal impact. This systematic literature review synthesizes the fragmented body of knowledge pertaining to the relevance and impact of business schools. Appreciating the contributions of both researchandeducation, this review offers a holistic view that acknowledges the multidimensional nature of business schools. Based on an analysis of 266 journal articles, we present the four main literature streams in this domain. We find limited evidence of cross‐fertilisation between discussions of research and education. However, by acknowledging the contribution of applying a multidimensional lens to the study of business schools, we develop aholistic thematic frameworkthat provides theoretical directions for the future. Using this, we demonstrate four avenues for advancing the business school literature. First, we emphasise the potential of an institutional logics perspective to viewing business schools. Second, we offer a novel proposal for understanding the bridge between research and education. Third, we emphasise the application of a value co‐creation theoretical lens when considering how business schools engage with stakeholders in researchandeducation. Finally, we propose an all‐encompassing stakeholder‐centric definition of relevant and impactful knowledge and advocate for this inclusive definition to conceptually bridge the fragmented discussions of research and education.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Durand;S. Dameron
通讯作者: S. Dameron
商学院研究的相关性差距:管理桥梁期刊引用了哪些学术论文?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Birkinshaw;Ramon Lecuona;P. Barwise
通讯作者: P. Barwise
超越严谨性和相关性:商业教育的批判现实主义方法
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Jawad Syed;J. Mingers;P. Murray
通讯作者: P. Murray
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Liliana Neriz;A. Núñez;Veronica Fuentes;Francisco J. Ramis;Oscar Jerez
通讯作者: Oscar Jerez
相关性差距。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1969
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Gustafson
通讯作者: J. Gustafson