Association Between Intensity of Posttreatment Surveillance Testing and Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
Association Between Intensity of Posttreatment Surveillance Testing and Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2018.5816
复制
发表时间:
2018-05-22
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network Cancer Surveillance Optimization Working Group
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Snyder RA;Hu CY;Cuddy A;Francescatti AB;Schumacher JR;Van Loon K;You YN;Kozower BD;Greenberg CC;Schrag D;Venook A;McKellar D;Winchester DP;Chang GJ;Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network Cancer Surveillance Optimization Working Group
Surveillance testing is performed after primary treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), but it is unclear if this testing decreases time to detection of recurrence or affects patient survival. To determine if intensity of post-treatment surveillance is associated with time to detection of CRC recurrence, rate of recurrence, resection for recurrence, or overall survival (OS). Observational retrospective cohort study. Patient data abstracted from the medical record as part of a Commission on Cancer (CoC) Special Study merged with records from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Random sample of Stage I-III CRC patients treated at CoC accredited facilities during 2006–2007 with follow up through December 31, 2014. Intensity of imaging and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) surveillance testing [higher (HI) and lower intensity (LI)] derived empirically at the facility level using the observed–to-expected ratio for surveillance testing during a 3-year observation period. The primary outcome was time to detection of CRC recurrence and recurrence rates; secondary outcomes included rates of resection for recurrent disease and overall survival (OS). 8529 patients at 1,175 facilities underwent surveillance imaging and CEA testing in the 3 years after CRC treatment. Patients with HI imaging (49.1%) or CEA (48.5%) had a mean of 2.9 (95% CI 2.8–2.9) imaging and 4.3 (95% CI 4.2–4.4) CEA tests. Patients with LI underwent a mean of 1.6 (95% CI 1.6–1.7) imaging and 1.6 (95% CI 1.6–1.7) CEA tests. There was no difference in median time to detection of recurrence by imaging [HI 15.1 (95% CI 8.2–26.3) vs. LI 16.0 (95% CI 7.9–27.2) months] or CEA intensity [HI 15.9 (95% CI 8.5–27.5) and LI 15.3 (95% CI 7.9–25.7) months] (p=0.60 and p=0.39). Imaging and CEA surveillance intensity were not associated with a difference in recurrence rates [HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.89–1.09) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.90–1.10), recurrence resection [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.89–1.09) and HR 1.00 (0.90–1.10)] or overall survival [HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94–1.08) and HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.89–1.03)], respectively. Among patients treated for Stage I-III colorectal cancer, there was no significant association between surveillance intensity and recurrence, resection, or overall survival.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Leong, Kai;Hartley, John;Karandikar, Sharad
通讯作者:
Karandikar, Sharad
影响因子:
50.5
作者:
Labianca, R.;Nordlinger, B.;Arnold, D.
通讯作者:
Arnold, D.
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
Price, RM;Bonett, DG
通讯作者:
Bonett, DG
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Primrose, John N.;Perera, Rafael;Mant, David
通讯作者:
Mant, David
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.;Mangu, Pamela B.;Benson, Al B., III
通讯作者:
Benson, Al B., III