Impact of the new kidney allocation system A2/A2B → B policy on access to transplantation among minority candidates.

Impact of the new kidney allocation system A2/A2B → B policy on access to transplantation among minority candidates.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/ajt.14719
复制
发表时间:
2018-08
期刊:
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Locke JE
Locke JE
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Martins PN;Mustian MN;MacLennan PA;Ortiz JA;Akoad M;Caicedo JC;Echeverri GJ;Gray SH;Lopez-Soler RI;Gunasekaran G;Kelly B;Mobley CM;Black SM;Esquivel C;Locke JE

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

血型B的候选人,其中许多人代表少数民族,历史上已经减少了获得死者供体肾移植(DDKT)。新的国家肾脏分配系统(KAS)优先将A2/A2 B血型的已故供体肾脏分配给B受体,以解决这种种族和血型差异。尚未有研究检查KAS对总体或少数群体B血型受者A2不相容(A2 i)DDKT的影响。根据移植受体科学登记处的报告,对2013-2017年的成人B DDKT血型受体进行了病例对照研究。病例被定义为A2/A2 B肾的受体,而对照组则是所有剩余的非A2/A2 B肾的受体。使用多变量logistic回归比较了KAS前(2013年1月1日-2014年12月3日)与KAS后(2014年12月4日-2017年2月28日)的A2 i DDKT趋势。与KAS前相比,KAS后A2 i DDKT的可能性增加了4.9倍(OR 4.92,95% CI:3.67-6.60)。然而,与白人相比,KAS后少数民族A2 i DDKT的可能性没有差异。尽管KAS导致A2/A2 B →B DDKT增加,但相对于白人,少数民族中A2 i DDKT的可能性并未改善。有必要进一步讨论旨在改善少数民族获得DDKT的A2/A2 B →B政策修订。
Blood group B candidates, many of whom represent ethnic minorities, have historically had diminished access to deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). The new national kidney allocation system (KAS) preferentially allocates blood group A2/A2B deceased donor kidneys to B recipients to address this ethnic and blood group disparity. No study has yet examined the impact of KAS on A2 incompatible (A2i) DDKT for blood group B recipients overall or among minorities. A case-control study of adult blood group B DDKT recipients from 2013–2017 was performed, as reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Cases were defined as recipients of A2/A2B kidneys, whereas controls were all remaining recipients of non-A2/A2B kidneys. A2i DDKT trends were compared from the pre-KAS (1/1/2013–12/3/2014) to the post-KAS period (12/4/2014–2/28/2017) using multivariable logistic regression. Post-KAS, there was a 4.9-fold increase in the likelihood of A2i DDKT, compared to the pre-KAS period (OR 4.92, 95% CI: 3.67–6.60). However, compared to whites, there was no difference in the likelihood of A2i DDKT among minorities post-KAS. Although KAS resulted in increasing A2/A2B→B DDKT, the likelihood of A2i DDKT among minorities, relative to whites, was not improved. Further discussion regarding A2/A2B→B policy revisions aimed to improve DDKT access for minorities is warranted.
DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000164288.82238.52
发表时间: 2005-07-15
期刊: TRANSPLANTATION
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Bryan, CF;Winklhofer, FT;Warady, BA
通讯作者: Warady, BA
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.020115.x
发表时间: 2002-01-01
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Nelson, PW;Shield, CF;Bryan, CF
通讯作者: Bryan, CF
DOI: 10.1056/nejm200011233432106
发表时间: 2000-11-23
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Epstein, AM;Ayanian, JZ;Conti, RM
通讯作者: Conti, RM
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181da191a
发表时间: 2010-06-15
期刊: TRANSPLANTATION
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Hurst, Frank P.;Sajjad, Imran;Jindal, Rahul M.
通讯作者: Jindal, Rahul M.
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2015080934
发表时间: 2016-08-01
影响因子: 13.6
作者:
Massie, Allan B.;Luo, Xun;Segev, Dorry L.
通讯作者: Segev, Dorry L.