Evaluation of a clinical and translational research initiative: Developing and implementing a collaborative evaluation process in CAIRIBU.
Evaluation of a clinical and translational research initiative: Developing and implementing a collaborative evaluation process in CAIRIBU.
复制标题
评估临床和转化研究计划：开发和实施凯里布的协作评估过程。
DOI：
10.1017/cts.2023.12
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Rolland, Betsy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allmaras, Jennifer M.;Penniston, Kristina L.;Rolland, Betsy
自 2010 年以来，对大型研究计划的资助有所增加，例如通过美国国立卫生研究院大学机制资助的研究计划；然而，关于如何评估此类举措是否成功的已发表研究很少。在这里，我们描述了良性泌尿学跨学科研究合作促进 (CAIRIBU) 研究社区的交互核心进行的协作评估规划过程，这是一项由国家糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所资助的临床和转化研究计划。评估对于衡量我们工作的影响以及持续改进 CAIRIBU 活动和举措是必要的。我们开发并实施了一个迭代的七步流程，让 Interactions Core、NIDDK 项目工作人员和受资助者参与规划流程的每一步。规划和实施评估计划面临的挑战包括调查人员提交新评估数据的时间负担、评估工作的时间和资源有限以及评估计划基础设施的开发。我们呼吁资助机构在未来大型研究联盟的资助机会公告中纳入对受资助者参与评估的更明确要求，以及支持评估过程的专用资金。
Funding for large research initiatives, such as those funded through the National Institutes of Health U mechanism, has increased since 2010; however, there is little published research on how to evaluate the success of such initiatives. Here, we describe the collaborative evaluation planning process undertaken by the Interactions Core of the Collaborating for the Advancement of Interdisciplinary Research in Benign Urology (CAIRIBU) research community, a clinical and translational research initiative funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Evaluation is necessary to measure the impact of our work and to allow for continuous improvement efforts of CAIRIBU activities and initiatives. We developed and implemented an iterative seven-step process that engaged the Interactions Core, NIDDK program staff, and grantees at each step of the planning process. Challenges faced in planning and implementing the evaluation plan included the time burden on investigators to submit new data for evaluations, finite time and resources for evaluation work, and the development of infrastructure for the evaluation plan. We call on funding agencies to include more explicit requirements for evaluation participation from grantees, as well as dedicated funding to support the evaluation process, in future funding opportunity announcements for large research consortia.
影响因子：
15.3
作者：
Esparza, Jose;Yamada, Tadataka
通讯作者：
Yamada, Tadataka
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Trochim, William M.;Rubio, Doris M.;Thomas, Veronica G.
通讯作者：
Thomas, Veronica G.
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Frey, Bruce B.;Lohmeier, Jill H.;Tollefson, Nona
通讯作者：
Tollefson, Nona