Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences
Gender Gaps in the Evaluation of Research: Evidence from Submissions to Economics Conferences
复制标题
研究评估中的性别差距：来自经济学会议提交材料的证据
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Carlos Sanz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Laura Hospido;Carlos Sanz
我们研究性别差异在评估提交给经济学会议。利用欧洲经济学会年会（2015-2017）、西班牙经济学会年会（2012-2017）和青年经济学家春季会议（2017）的数据，我们发现全女性作者的论文被接受的可能性比全男性作者的论文低3.2个百分点（6.8%）。在控制了(i)作者数量，（ii）审稿人固定效应，（iii）领域，（iv）论文提交年份的引用，(v)作者以前的发表记录，以及（vi）作者所属机构的质量之后，这种差距是存在的。我们还发现，这一差距完全是由男性审稿人造成的——女性审稿人对男性和女性作者的论文的评价相似，但男性审稿人更喜欢男性撰写的论文。
We study gender differences in the evaluation of submissions to economics conferences. Using data from the Annual Congress of the European Economic Association (2015-2017), the Annual Meeting of the Spanish Economic Association (2012-2017), and the Spring Meeting of Young Economists (2017), we find that all-female-authored papers are 3.2 p.p. (6.8%) less likely to be accepted than all-male-authored papers. This gap is present after controlling for (i) number of authors, (ii) referee fixed effects, (iii) field, (iv) cites of the paper at submission year, (v) previous publication record of the authors, and (vi) the quality of the affiliations of the authors. We also find that the gap is entirely driven by male referees - female referees evaluate male and female-authored papers similarly, but male referees are more favorable towards papers written by men.
影响因子：
8
作者：
Sherman, Mila Getmansky;Tookes, Heather E.
通讯作者：
Tookes, Heather E.