An online community peer support intervention to promote COVID-19 vaccine information among essential workers: a randomized trial.
An online community peer support intervention to promote COVID-19 vaccine information among essential workers: a randomized trial.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/07853890.2022.2138960
复制
发表时间：
2022-12
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
在美国，包括医护人员在内的疫苗犹豫仍然猖獗。为前线基本工作人员（例如医护人员）接种疫苗非常重要，特别是在大流行期间。我们测试了为期4周的在线同伴主导干预（利用在线同伴教育）的有效性，以促进基本工作者对COVID-19疫苗信息的要求。参与者（N = 120）和同行领导者（N = 12）于2021年7月23日至8月20日通过网络广告招募。合格标准包括：18岁或以上，美国居民，讲英语，COVID-19疫苗推广阶段1a或1 B的一部分（例如一线基本工作人员），未接种过COVID-19疫苗，但能够接种。这是一项平行分配随机试验。STATA用于使用随机数生成器创建随机化，以便将参与者和同行领导者分配到组中的所有可能性相等。参与者被随机分配到干预或控制组，其中包括两个私人的隐藏Facebook群组，每个群组有30名参与者。同伴领导者被随机分配到一个干预组，每组有六名同伴领导者。干预组的参与者被随机分配到三个同伴领导者。分配后对受试者设盲。同行领导人的任务是每周至少三次与指定的参与者接触。参与者完成了基线和干预后调查。该研究在ClinicalTrials.org上注册，标识符为NCT 04376515，不再招募。这项工作得到了NIAID的资助5 R 01 AI 132030 -05。共分析了101名参与者（50名干预组和51名对照组）。干预组6人，对照组0人要求提供疫苗信息。干预组10人，对照组6人提供疫苗接种证明。干预组要求提供疫苗信息的几率是对照组的13倍（95%置信区间：（1.5，1772），p值= 0.015）。干预组的37名参与者和对照组的31名参与者在研究期间的某个时候参与。在干预组中，要求疫苗信息的几率是13倍。同行领导的在线社区可能有助于传播信息和帮助公共卫生工作，以打击疫苗犹豫。结果表明，同行领导的在线社区团体可能有助于传播健康信息，帮助公共卫生工作，并打击疫苗犹豫。
Vaccine hesitancy is still rampant in the United States, including health care personnel. Vaccination of frontline essential workers (e.g. health care workers) is very important, especially during a pandemic. We tested the efficacy of a 4-week online, peer-led intervention (Harnessing Online Peer Education) to promote requests for COVID-19 vaccine information among essential workers. Participants (N = 120) and peer leaders (N = 12) were recruited through online advertisements from July 23 to August 20, 2021. Eligibility criteria included: 18 years or older, U.S. resident, English speaker, part of phase 1a or 1 b of COVID-19 vaccine rollout (e.g. frontline essential workers), hadn’t received a COVID-19 vaccine but able to receive one. This was a parallel assignment randomised trial. STATA was used to create a randomisation using a random number generator so that all possible assignments of participants and peer leaders to groups were equally likely. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms that consisted of two private, hidden Facebook groups, each with 30 participants. Peer leaders were randomly assigned to an intervention group, each with six peer leaders. Participants in the intervention arm were randomly assigned to three peer leaders. Participants were blinded after assignment. Peer leaders were tasked with reaching out to their assigned participants at least three times each week. Participants completed a baseline and a post intervention survey. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.org under identifier NCT04376515 and is no longer recruiting. This work was supported by the NIAID under grant 5R01AI132030-05. A total of 101 participants analysed (50 intervention and 51 control). Six people in the intervention group and 0 people in the control group requested vaccine information. Ten people in the intervention group and six people in the control group provided proof of vaccination. The odds of requesting vaccine information in the intervention group was 13 times that in the control group (95% confidence interval: (1.5, 1772), p-value = 0.015). Thirty-seven participants in the intervention group and 31 in the control group were engaged at some point during the study. The odds of requesting vaccine information was 13 times in the intervention group. Peer-led online communities may help to disseminate information and aid public health efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy. Results suggest peer-led online community groups may help to disseminate health information, aid public health efforts, and combat vaccine hesitancy.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Pal S;Shekhar R;Kottewar S;Upadhyay S;Singh M;Pathak D;Kapuria D;Barrett E;Sheikh AB
通讯作者：
Sheikh AB
DOI：
10.1016/s2352-3018(14)00006-x
发表时间：
2015-01
期刊：
The lancet. HIV
影响因子：
--
作者：
Young SD;Cumberland WG;Nianogo R;Menacho LA;Galea JT;Coates T
通讯作者：
Coates T
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
PLOS global public health
影响因子：
--
作者：
Mulberry N;Tupper P;Kirwin E;McCabe C;Colijn C
通讯作者：
Colijn C
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Young SD;Jaganath D
通讯作者：
Jaganath D
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Young, Sean D.;Koussa, Maryann;Heinzerling, Keith
通讯作者：
Heinzerling, Keith