Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic.

Tie Decay and Dissolution: Contentious Prescribing Practices in the Prescription Drug Epidemic.
复制标题

领带腐烂和溶解:处方药流行中的有争议的处方实践。

DOI:
10.1287/orsc.2020.1412
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
King, Marissa D.
King, Marissa D.
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang, Victoria (Shu);King, Marissa D.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

虽然大量的研究工作已经调查了领带形成的驱动因素,但人们越来越有兴趣了解为什么关系会衰退或完全消失。网络文献倾向于将关系衰减概念化为由类似于关系形成的过程驱动。然而,通过持续的互动揭示的信息可以对领带的形成和领带的衰变产生不同的影响。本文通过关注有争议的实践来研究领带衰变和领带形成过程的不同之处。在某种程度上,有争议的做法的差异信息是通过不断的互动学习,它可以发挥不同的影响领带的形成和领带衰变。使用141,543名医生二人组的纵向数据集,我们发现有争议的处方差异导致关系减弱或完全消失,但不影响关系的形成。实践越有争议,有关实践的信息越多,对领带腐烂和溶解的影响就越强。总的来说,这些发现有助于更细致地理解关系演变是一个展开的过程,通过这个过程,更深层次的差异被揭示出来,并塑造了关系的结果。
Although a substantial body of work has investigated drivers of tie formation, there is growing interest in understanding why relationships decay or dissolve altogether. The networks literature has tended to conceptualize tie decay as driven by processes similar to those underlying tie formation. Yet information that is revealed through ongoing interactions can exert different effects on tie formation and tie decay. This paper investigates how tie decay and tie formation processes differ by focusing on contentious practices. To the extent that information about dissimilarities in contentious practices is learned through ongoing interactions, it can exert diverging effects on tie formation and tie decay. Using a longitudinal data set of 141,543 physician dyads, we find that differences in contentious prescribing led ties to weaken or dissolve altogether but did not affect tie formation. The more contentious the practice and the more information available about the practice, the stronger the effect on tie decay and dissolution. Collectively, these findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of relationship evolution as an unfolding process through which deeper-level differences are revealed and shape the outcome of the tie.
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8733(99)00015-5
发表时间: 2000-01-01
期刊: SOCIAL NETWORKS
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Burt, RS
通讯作者: Burt, RS
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.07.001
发表时间: 2007-09-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Cook, Joan M.;Biyanova, Tatyana;Coyne, James C.
通讯作者: Coyne, James C.
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
发表时间: 2012-03-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Ahuja, Gautam;Soda, Giuseppe;Zaheer, Akbar
通讯作者: Zaheer, Akbar
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.07.004
发表时间: 2021-09-26
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Aven, Brandy;Morse, Lily;Iorio, Alessandro
通讯作者: Iorio, Alessandro
DOI: 10.1177/003335491412900207
发表时间: 2014-03-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Brady, Joanne E.;Wunsch, Hannah;Li, Guohua
通讯作者: Li, Guohua