Getting the Most Out of Your Genome-Wide Association Study Using Polygenic Risk Scores.

Getting the Most Out of Your Genome-Wide Association Study Using Polygenic Risk Scores.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1128/jcm.00223-23
复制
发表时间:
2023-07-20
影响因子:
9.4
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

确定表型结果的风险是“支持”或“反对”表型的变异的复杂平衡,在人类遗传疾病的背景下,已使用多基因风险评分进行了总结。在之前发表的一篇文章中(K。T.赫尔曼湖Challagundla,B. M.格雷,D. A.罗宾逊,J Clin Microbiol 61:e01412-22,2023,https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01412-22),Hellmann及其同事证明了如何使用细菌多基因风险评分来预测S.新生儿表皮感染与定植导致预测准确性的增加和对外部数据的可推广性的改善。
Determining the risk of a phenotypic outcome is a complex balance of variants “for” or “against” the phenotype, which in the context of human genetic diseases have been summarized using polygenic risk scores. In a previously published article (K. T. Hellmann, L. Challagundla, B. M. Gray, D. A. Robinson, J Clin Microbiol 61:e01412-22, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01412-22), Hellmann and colleagues demonstrate how the use of a bacterial polygenic risk score to predict S. epidermidis infection versus colonization in neonates led to both increases in predictive accuracy and improved generalizability to external data.
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000337
发表时间: 2020-03-01
期刊: MICROBIAL GENOMICS
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Saber, Morteza M.;Shapiro, B. Jesse
通讯作者: Shapiro, B. Jesse
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19714-9
发表时间: 2020-11-24
影响因子: 16.6
作者:
Biggel M;Xavier BB;Johnson JR;Nielsen KL;Frimodt-Møller N;Matheeussen V;Goossens H;Moons P;Van Puyvelde S
通讯作者: Van Puyvelde S
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01696-z
发表时间: 2022-01
期刊: Pediatric research
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Celik IH;Hanna M;Canpolat FE;Mohan Pammi
通讯作者: Mohan Pammi
DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.10
发表时间: 2015-05-14
期刊: Nature reviews. Disease primers
影响因子: --
作者:
Ratjen F;Bell SC;Rowe SM;Goss CH;Quittner AL;Bush A
通讯作者: Bush A
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.048
发表时间: 2020-03-01
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Dennison, Charlotte A.;Legge, Sophie E.;Walters, James T. R.
通讯作者: Walters, James T. R.