It's a challenge! Empathizing with sad but not with angry individuals results in cardiovascular reactivity consistent with a challenge motivational state.
It's a challenge! Empathizing with sad but not with angry individuals results in cardiovascular reactivity consistent with a challenge motivational state.
复制标题
这是一个挑战！
作者：
Sassenrath;Wagner;Keller;Sassenberg
共情个体会对他人产生什么样的感觉这一问题引发了无数研究，主要关注共情的情感效价以及由此产生的亲社会行为后果（参见共情与利他主义辩论）。目前的研究可能通过检查共情个体的心血管反应来促进这场持久的争论。为此，应用了挑战和威胁的生物心理社会模型（Blascovich & Tomaka，1996）并实施了阻抗心动图，同时指导个体感受对需求引起的事件有不同反应（愤怒与悲伤）的目标人。因此，可以测试移情者在感受到有需要的目标人时是否处理与应对相关的线索。一项实验（N = 160 名女性）的结果表明，同情悲伤（相对于愤怒）的目标会导致心血管反应与相对挑战一致——一种与相对较高资源相关的能量调动状态。这些发现表明，与应对相关的评估过程会影响同理心个体在心血管反应方面的反应。反过来，这提供了关于同理心的情感动机结果的新颖见解。
The question of what feeling with another person elicits in the empathizing individual has instigated innumerable studies mainly focusing on the affective valence of empathy and the resulting consequences for prosocial behavior (cf. the empathy–altruism debate). The present research may contribute to this long-lasting debate by examining the cardiovascular reactivity of the empathizing individual. To that effect, the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat (Blascovich & Tomaka, 1996) was applied and impedance cardiography was implemented while individuals were instructed to feel with a target person who reacted differently to a need-causing event (with anger vs. sadness). Thereby, it is possible to test whether empathizers process coping-related cues when feeling with a target person in need. Results of one experiment (N= 160 women) revealed that empathizing with a sad (vs. an angry) target results in cardiovascular reactivity consistent with relative challenge—an energy-mobilizing state associated with relatively high resources. These findings suggest that coping-related appraisal processes influence how the empathizing individual reacts in terms of cardiovascular reactivity. This, in turn, provides novel insights regarding the affective-motivational outcomes of empathy.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Psychological Research
影响因子：
--
作者：
Annika Scholl;K. Moeller;D. Scheepers;H. Nuerk;K. Sassenberg
通讯作者：
K. Sassenberg
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Huang, Li;Galinsky, Adam D.;Guillory, Lucia E.
通讯作者：
Guillory, Lucia E.
生气，滚蛋：多方谈判中愤怒沟通的人际影响
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
I. Beest;G. A. Kleef;E. Dijk
通讯作者：
E. Dijk
可以使用 R 峰值而不是 Q 来计算预射期。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Mark D. Seery;Cheryl L. Kondrak;Lindsey Streamer;Thomas L. Saltsman;Veronica M. Lamarche
通讯作者：
Veronica M. Lamarche
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Fukushima, Hirokata;Hiraki, Kazuo
通讯作者：
Hiraki, Kazuo