Two Texts, Three Readers: Distance and Expertise in Reading History.
Two Texts, Three Readers: Distance and Expertise in Reading History.
复制标题
两篇文本，三个读者：阅读历史的距离和专业知识。
DOI：
10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
复制
发表时间：
1996
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
K. Young
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Geaa Leinhardt;K. Young
历史学家是非凡的，而不是典型的读者，他们经常对历史文献进行自觉的、定向的阅读和重读，在文献和他们自己关于一个问题的历史理论之间反复移动。这项研究旨在比较历史学家阅读高度熟悉的特权文本和阅读家族性但不熟悉的文本的阅读实践，并确定历史学家何时以及如何使用一般历史知识和特定主题的专业知识。两位专家历史学家被要求选择一份对他们目前的工作至关重要的文件，然后阅读和解释他们自己的文件(Close)和一位同事的选择(FAR)。第三位历史学家将这两篇不熟悉的经文作为对照阅读。我们的期望得到了证实：(A)历史学家具有一般的文献阅读知识，包括识别和解释的图式；(B)历史学家的一般知识与他们的特定主题的专业知识动态互动；(C)历史学家阅读文献的方式与主题相关。
Historians are extraordinary, rather than typical, readers who routinely engage in the self-conscious, directed reading and rereading of historical documents, moving iteratively between documents and their own historical theories about an issue. This study was designed to compare the reading practices of historians reading highly familiar privileged texts with those reading familial but unfamiliar texts, and to determine when and how historians use general historical knowledge versus topic-specific expertise. Two expert historians were asked to select a document critical to their current work and then to read and interpret their own document (close) and a colleague's selection (far). A third historian read the two unfamiliar texts as a control. Our expectations were confirmed: (a) Historians have general document-reading knowledge that includes schemas for identification and interpretation, (b) historians' general knowledge dynamically interacts with their topic-specific expertise, (c) historians read fam...
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
KINTSCH, W
通讯作者：
KINTSCH, W