Guidelines for research on drugged driving.
Guidelines for research on drugged driving.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02277.x
复制
发表时间：
2008-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mørland J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walsh JM;Verstraete AG;Huestis MA;Mørland J
在评估吸毒对驾驶和整体交通安全的真正公共健康影响时，一个主要问题是，各项研究中测量的变量差异很大。在越来越多的全球文献中报告的研究中，由于缺乏该领域的标准化，评估的基本参数、分析技术和测试的药物根本无法比较。这些缺点严重限制了这项研究的价值，以增加知识的领域。迫切需要一套标准来协调研究结果。该项目是由几个国际组织发起的，目的是为吸毒后驾驶的研究制定指导方针。2006年9月举行的一次国际专家会议讨论了统一今后对吸毒后驾车进行研究的议定书问题。会议的主要目标是编写一份协商一致的报告，确定指导方针、标准、核心数据变量和其他控制措施，作为今后国际研究的基础。采用改进的德尔菲法制定准则草案。随后，这些准则草案被张贴在互联网上供全球审查，收到的意见被纳入最后文件。指引文件分为三个主要部分，分别集中于药物后驾驶研究的不同范畴（例如路边调查、普遍性研究、医院研究、死亡及撞车调查等）。在“行为学”、“流行病学”和“毒理学”的关键问题领域内。行为部分包含32条具体建议;（2）流行病学40条建议;（3）毒理学64条建议。预计这些指南将显著提高药物驾驶研究的整体质量，并促进未来的国家和全球交叉研究比较。
A major problem in assessing the true public health impact of drug-use on driving and overall traffic safety is that the variables being measured across studies vary significantly. In studies reported in a growing global literature, basic parameters assessed, analytical techniques and drugs tested are simply not comparable due to lack of standardization in the field. These shortcomings severely limit the value of this research to add knowledge to the field. A set of standards to harmonize research findings is sorely needed. This project was initiated by several international organizations to develop guidelines for research on drugged driving. A September 2006 meeting of international experts discussed the harmonization of protocols for future research on drugged driving. The principal objective of the meeting was to develop a consensus report setting guidelines, standards, core data variables and other controls that would form the basis for future international research. A modified Delphi method was utilized to develop draft guidelines. Subsequently, these draft guidelines were posted on the internet for global review, and comments received were integrated into the final document. The Guidelines Document is divided into three major sections, each focusing upon different aspects of drugged driving research (e.g. roadside surveys, prevalence studies, hospital studies, fatality and crash investigations, etc.) within the critical issue areas of ‘behavior’, ‘epidemiology’ and ‘toxicology’. The behavioral section contains 32 specific recommendations; (2) epidemiology 40 recommendations; and (3) toxicology 64 recommendations. It is anticipated that these guidelines will improve significantly the overall quality of drugged driving research and facilitate future cross-study comparisons nationally and globally.
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Drummer, OH;Gerostamoulos, J;Swann, P
通讯作者：
Swann, P