Predictive Utility of Alternate Measures of Physical Activity and Diet for Overweight and Obesity in Low-Income Minority Women.

Predictive Utility of Alternate Measures of Physical Activity and Diet for Overweight and Obesity in Low-Income Minority Women.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/08901171211069992
复制
发表时间:
2022-06
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Datar, Ashlesha
Datar, Ashlesha
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Ying;Shier, Victoria;King, Sara;Datar, Ashlesha

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

The purpose is to compare the predictive utility of alternate measures of diet and physical activity for overweight and obesity among low-income minority women. Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a cohort study. Three public housing developments in South Los Angeles. Subjects: Adult women (N = 425). Primary outcome—weight status (normal BMI, overweight, or obese). Primary predictors—diet: 24-hour dietary recalls (Healthy Eating Index), dietary screener (intake of specific food groups), and single-item survey question (diet quality); physical activity: accelerometry (minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous activity), short recall questionnaire (minutes/week of moderate and vigorous activity), and single-item questions (days per week did exercise; self-assessment of overall activity level). Multinomial logistic regression models, controlling for socio-demographic covariates. Models are built up starting with least resource-intensive measures of diet and physical activity (single items) and sequentially adding more resource-intensive measures. Model performance is assessed via information-based model selection indices. Adjusted relative risk for obesity for single-item measures ranged from .61 to .64 for diet (P < .01) and from .80 to .81 for PA (P <.05). The added value of resource-intensive measures was negligible for physical activity and at best small for diet. Single-item questions for diet and physical activity can provide valuable information about risk for overweight and obesity in low-income minority women when more resource-intensive assessments are infeasible.
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s129785
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Pedersen AB;Mikkelsen EM;Cronin-Fenton D;Kristensen NR;Pham TM;Pedersen L;Petersen I
通讯作者: Petersen I
DOI: 10.1038/s41387-018-0041-1
发表时间: 2018-05-24
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
Goni L;García-Granero M;Milagro FI;Cuervo M;Martínez JA
通讯作者: Martínez JA
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-693
发表时间: 2012-08-24
期刊: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Rodjer, Lars;Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg H.;Borjesson, Mats
通讯作者: Borjesson, Mats
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.08.009
发表时间: 2019-03-01
期刊: NUTRITION
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Kim, You Jin;Hwang, Ji-Yun;Kwon, Oran
通讯作者: Kwon, Oran
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr317
发表时间: 2012-02-15
影响因子: 5
作者:
Carroll, Raymond J.;Midthune, Douglas;Kipnis, Victor
通讯作者: Kipnis, Victor