Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage with dark-blood T2*-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage with dark-blood T2*-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12968-021-00787-4
复制
发表时间:
2021-07-15
期刊:
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dharmakumar R
Dharmakumar R
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guan X;Chen Y;Yang HJ;Zhang X;Ren D;Sykes J;Butler J;Han H;Zeng M;Prato FS;Dharmakumar R

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

心肌梗死(MI)中的心肌内出血(IMH)与主要不良心血管事件相关。基于全血T2* 的心血管磁共振(CMR)已成为非侵入性IMH检测的参考标准。尽管如此,在IMH检测的临床和临床前环境中,基于暗血T2 * 的CMR正在与亮血T2* 加权CMR互换使用。然而,到目前为止,还没有研究暗血T2* 加权相对于亮血T2* 加权CMR的IMH表征的相对优点。我们研究了暗血T2* 加权CMR对亮血T2 * 加权CMR在临床和临床前环境中IMH表征的诊断能力。出血性心肌梗死患者(n = 20)和犬(n = 11)在急性和慢性期在1.5和3 T下进行了深色和明亮的血液T2* 加权CMR成像。评估了暗血T2 * 加权CMR相对于亮血T2 * 加权CMR用于IMH表征的成像特征(相对信噪比(SNR)、相对对比度噪声(CNR)、IMH程度)和诊断性能(灵敏度、特异性、准确度、曲线下面积和观察者间变异性)。在临床和临床前环境中,与亮血T2* 加权CMR相比,暗血T2* 加权图像具有显著较低的SNR、CNR和降低的IMH程度(所有p < 0.05)。与亮血T2 * 加权CMR相比,暗血T2 * 加权CMR的敏感性、特异性、准确性和观察者间变异性也较弱(所有p < 0.05)。这些观察结果在梗死年龄和成像场强之间是一致的。虽然IMH在暗血T2* 加权CMR上可见,但在1.5和3 T下,在临床和临床前环境中,IMH的整体显著性与亮血T2* 加权图像中观察到的相比显著降低。因此,亮血T2* 加权CMR更适合临床使用,因为暗血T2* 加权CMR可能将出血性MI错误分类为非出血性MI。
Intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) within myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Bright-blood T2*-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as the reference standard for non-invasive IMH detection. Despite this, the dark-blood T2*-based CMR is becoming interchangeably used with bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR in both clinical and preclinical settings for IMH detection. To date however, the relative merits of dark-blood T2*-weighted with respect to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization has not been studied. We investigated the diagnostic capacity of dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR against bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization in clinical and preclinical settings. Hemorrhagic MI patients (n = 20) and canines (n = 11) were imaged in the acute and chronic phases at 1.5 and 3 T with dark- and bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR. Imaging characteristics (Relative signal-to-noise (SNR), Relative contrast-to-noise (CNR), IMH Extent) and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area-under-the-curve, and inter-observer variability) of dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization were assessed relative to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR. At both clinical and preclinical settings, compared to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR, dark-blood T2*-weighted images had significantly lower SNR, CNR and reduced IMH extent (all p < 0.05). Dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR also demonstrated weaker sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-observer variability compared to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR (all p < 0.05). These observations were consistent across infarct age and imaging field strengths. While IMH can be visible on dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR, the overall conspicuity of IMH is significantly reduced compared to that observed in bright-blood T2*-weighted images, across infarct age in clinical and preclinical settings at 1.5 and 3 T. Hence, bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR would be preferable for clinical use since dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR carries the potential to misclassify hemorrhagic MIs as non-hemorrhagic MIs.
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8
发表时间: 2017-10-09
期刊: Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
影响因子: --
作者:
Messroghli DR;Moon JC;Ferreira VM;Grosse-Wortmann L;He T;Kellman P;Mascherbauer J;Nezafat R;Salerno M;Schelbert EB;Taylor AJ;Thompson R;Ugander M;van Heeswijk RB;Friedrich MG
通讯作者: Friedrich MG
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.113.001541
发表时间: 2014-05
期刊: Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
影响因子: --
作者:
Kali A;Cokic I;Tang RL;Yang HJ;Sharif B;Marbán E;Li D;Berman DS;Dharmakumar R
通讯作者: Dharmakumar R
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122397
发表时间: 2013-11-01
期刊: RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 19.7
作者:
Kali, Avinash;Tang, Richard L. Q.;Dharmakumar, Rohan
通讯作者: Dharmakumar, Rohan
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.08.016
发表时间: 2011-12-01
影响因子: 14
作者:
Kumar, Andreas;Green, Jordin D.;Friedrich, Matthias G.
通讯作者: Friedrich, Matthias G.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.007
发表时间: 2014-01-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Liguori, Carlo;Di Giampietro, Ilenia;Zobel, Bruno Beomonte
通讯作者: Zobel, Bruno Beomonte