Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.
Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.
复制标题
根据四项意外事件比根据三项意外事件更好地分析样本匹配绩效。
DOI：
10.1002/jeab.32
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Elliffe,DouglasM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones,BrentM;Elliffe,DouglasM
四只鸽子执行了同时样本匹配（MTS）任务，涉及两个样本和两个像素密度和亮度不同的比较。经过两个样本后正确反应强化的长期历史，15 个条件安排了样本 1 后正确反应的持续强化和样本 2 后所有反应的消失，或反之亦然。正确反应得到强化后的样本在连续的条件下交替进行。在准因子设计中，样本之间的差异和比较之间的差异在不同条件下独立变化。与现有定量模型的预测相反，现有定量模型假设 MTS 任务涉及两个 3 项强化意外事件，在这些条件下，匹配精度不处于偶然水平，两个样本后的比较选择比有所不同，并且观察到样本差异和比较差异对匹配精度的影响。然而，这些结果与 Jones (2003) MTS 任务中的刺激和强化效应理论的顺序预测（有时是定量预测）一致。该理论断言，MTS 任务涉及四项强化意外事件，并且在一组试验中选择一个比较比另一个更频繁地选择一个比较的任何倾向都反映了两个样本之后的比较辨别准确度之间的有意义的差异。
Four pigeons performed a simultaneous matching‐to‐sample (MTS) task involving two samples and two comparisons that differed in their pixel density and luminance. After a long history of reinforcers for correct responses after both samples, 15 conditions arranged either continuous reinforcement of correct responses after Sample 1 and extinction for all responses after Sample 2, or vice versa. The sample after which correct responses were reinforced alternated across successive conditions. The disparity between the samples and the disparity between the comparisons were varied independently across conditions in a quasifactorial design. Contrary to predictions of extant quantitative models, which assume that MTS tasks involve two 3‐term contingencies of reinforcement, matching accuracies were not at chance levels in these conditions, comparison–selection ratios differed after the two samples, and effects on matching accuracies of both sample disparity and comparison disparity were observed. These results were, however, consistent with ordinal and sometimes quantitative predictions of Jones' (2003) theory of stimulus and reinforcement effects in MTS tasks. This theory asserts that MTS tasks involve four‐term contingencies of reinforcement and that any tendency to select one comparison more often than the other over a set of trials reflects meaningful differences between comparison‐discrimination accuracies after the two samples.
登录
查看更多内容
样本延迟匹配中的样本刺激辨别力和对强化的敏感性。
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
B. M. Jones;K. White
通讯作者：
K. White
鸽子延迟匹配中食物和非食物样本的对称和不对称编码
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. S. Grant
通讯作者：
D. S. Grant
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
M. Sidman
通讯作者：
M. Sidman
鸽子样本匹配期间的检测和决策过程模型：延迟和同时匹配任务中 88 个不同波长的性能
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Wright;S. Sands
通讯作者：
S. Sands
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
B. Jones;M. Davison
通讯作者：
M. Davison