Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: a diffusion phantom and human brain study.
Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: a diffusion phantom and human brain study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.010
复制
发表时间:
2011-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Zhong, Jianhui
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhu, Tong;Hu, Rui;Qiu, Xing;Taylor, Michael;Tso, Yuen;Yiannoutsos, Constantin;Navia, Bradford;Mori, Susumu;Ekholm, Sven;Schifitto, Giovanni;Zhong, Jianhui
The inter-site and intra-site variability of system performance of MRI scanners (due to site-dependent and time-variant variations) can have significant adverse effects on the integration of multi-center DTI data. Measurement errors in accuracy and precision of each acquisition determine both the inter-site and intra-site variability. In this study, multiple scans of an identical isotropic diffusion phantom and of the brain of a travelling human volunteer were acquired at MRI scanners from the same vendor and with similar configurations at three sites. We assessed the feasibility of multi-center DTI studies by direct quantification of accuracy and precision of each dataset. Accuracy was quantified via comparison to carefully constructed gold standard datasets while precision (the within-scan variability) was estimated by wild bootstrap analysis. The results from both the phantom and human data suggest that the inter-site variation in system performance, although relatively small among scanners of the same vendor, significantly affects DTI measurement accuracy and precision and therefore the effectiveness for the integration of multi-center DTI measurements. Our results also highlight the value of a DTI-specific phantom in identifying and quantifying measurement errors due to site-dependent variations in the system performance, and its usefulness for quality assurance/quality control in multi-center DTI studies. In addition, we observed that the within-scan variability of each data acquisition, as assessed by wild bootstrap analysis, is of the same magnitude as the inter-site and intra-site variability. We propose that by weighing datasets based on their variability, as evaluated by wild bootstrap analysis, one can improve the quality of the dataset. This approach will provide a more effective integration of datasets from multi-center DTI studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.6
作者:
Jones, Derek K.
通讯作者:
Jones, Derek K.
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Chung, SungWon;Courcot, Blandine;Henry, Roland G.
通讯作者:
Henry, Roland G.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Farrell, Jonathan A. D.;Landman, Bennett A.;Mori, Susumu
通讯作者:
Mori, Susumu
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Friedman, Lee;Glover, Gary H.
通讯作者:
Glover, Gary H.
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Marenco, Stefano;Rawlings, Robert;Weinberger, Daniel R.
通讯作者:
Weinberger, Daniel R.