Systematic mapping shows the need for increased socio-ecological research on oil palm
Systematic mapping shows the need for increased socio-ecological research on oil palm
复制标题
系统制图表明需要加强对油棕的社会生态研究
DOI：
10.1088/1748-9326/abfc77
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
E. C. Turner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. J. Reiss;S. Luke;J. Stone;Gorm E. Shackelford;E. C. Turner
在过去的世纪里，油棕已从西非的一种生计作物发展成为一种主要的全球农业商品，对生物多样性、环境、社会和生计产生了重大影响。虽然油棕产业为整个热带地区的地方和国家经济做出了贡献，但人们对油棕种植对生物多样性和生态系统功能以及对当地社区和农民的负面影响表示严重关切。人们越来越意识到需要更可持续地管理农业景观，以及生态，社会和跨学科研究的重要性。为了了解油棕在这些领域的研究现状，我们进行了系统的绘图工作，以量化油棕种植的社会，生态和跨学科的社会生态研究，评估研究趋势，并确定文献中的优先知识差距。使用系统性综述和荟萃分析以及环境证据协作方案的适应性首选报告项检索文献。我们回顾了4959篇有关油棕种植的生态、社会和社会生态影响的出版物。根据研究背景（研究中心的位置和类型）、对照（研究进行的比较类型）、干预（正在研究的潜在行动或决策）和结局（干预对人群的影响）对每篇出版物进行分类。这导致了443篇分类论文，然后我们进行了更详细的分析，以确定学科之间和社会生态研究中不同研究焦点的共同出现。我们发现，在过去的三十年里，全球油棕研究有所增加，明显偏向马来西亚和印度尼西亚，反映了全球生产趋势。超过70%的研究集中在生态结果上，19%集中在社会方面，不到10%集中在跨学科方面。大多数研究是在工业种植园内进行的，并与森林等未改变的生境进行比较。研究主要集中在种植对产量、无脊椎动物生物多样性和生计的影响上。为了将我们的研究结果置于棕榈油生产和可持续发展优先事项的背景下，我们使用了以吨为单位的区域油棕榈生产信息，可持续认证机构的优先事项，以及产量差距的公认原因。最紧迫的知识差距包括缺乏对种植园投入对授粉和食草动物的影响、生态因素与人类健康和福祉之间的关系以及对油棕种植园内不同管理做法的比较的研究。我们主张这些差距成为未来研究关注的焦点，因为它们存在于已确定的优先研究领域，并且结果可能对更可持续的棕榈油生产的发展至关重要。
In the past century, oil palm has developed from a sustenance crop in West Africa to a major global agricultural commodity, with substantial impacts on biodiversity, the environment, society, and livelihoods. Although the oil palm industry contributes to local and national economies across the tropics, there are significant concerns about the negative effects of oil palm cultivation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, as well on local communities and farmers. There is a growing awareness of the need for managing agricultural landscapes more sustainably, and the importance of ecological, social, and also interdisciplinary research to inform this. To understand the current status of research across these areas for oil palm, we carried out a systematic mapping exercise to quantify social, ecological, and interdisciplinary socio-ecological research on oil palm cultivation, assess trends in the research, and to identify priority knowledge gaps in the literature. Literature was searched using adapted preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and Collaboration for Environmental Evidence protocols. We reviewed 4959 publications on the ecological, social, and socioecological effects of oil palm cultivation. Each publication was classified according to study context (the study site location and type), comparators (the type of comparison the study makes), intervention (the potential action or decision being studied), and outcome (the effects of the intervention on the population). This resulted in 443 classified papers, which we then analyzed in more detail, to identify co-occurrence of different research foci between the disciplines and in socio-ecological research. We found a global increase in oil palm research over the past three decades, with a clear bias to Malaysia and Indonesia, mirroring global production trends. Over 70% of the research was focused on ecological outcomes, 19% on social, and less than 10% interdisciplinary. The majority of studies were conducted within industrial plantations, with comparisons to non-modified habitats, such as forests. Research has focused most on the effects of cultivation on yield, invertebrate biodiversity, and livelihood. To place our findings in context of production of palm oil and sustainability priorities, we used information on regional oil palm production in Tonnes, priorities of sustainable certification bodies, and recognized causes of yield gaps. The most pressing knowledge gaps included a lack of studies on the effects of plantation inputs on pollination and herbivory, the relationship between ecological factors and human health and wellbeing, and comparisons of different management practices within oil palm plantations. We advocate that these gaps become the focus of future research attention, as they lie in identified priority research areas and outcomes are likely to be critical to informing the development of more sustainable palm oil production.
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Heilmayr, Robert;Carlson, Kimberly M.;Benedict, Jason Jon
通讯作者：
Benedict, Jason Jon