Assessing group differences in biodiversity by simultaneously testing a user‐defined selection of diversity indices
Assessing group differences in biodiversity by simultaneously testing a user‐defined selection of diversity indices
复制标题
通过同时测试用户定义的多样性指数选择来评估生物多样性的群体差异
DOI:
10.1111/1755-0998.12004
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Schork
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pallmann;Schaarschmidt;Hothorn;Fischer;Priesnitz;Schork
Comparing diversities between groups is a task biologists are frequently faced with, for example in ecological field trials or when dealing with metagenomics data. However, researchers often waver about which measure of diversity to choose as there is a multitude of approaches available. As Jost (2008,Molecular Ecology,17, 4015) has pointed out, widely used measures such as the Shannon or Simpson index have undesirable properties which make them hard to compare and interpret. Many of the problems associated with the use of these ‘raw’ indices can be corrected by transforming them into ‘true’ diversity measures. We introduce a technique that allows the comparison of two or more groups of observations and simultaneously tests a user‐defined selection of a number of ‘true’ diversity measures. This procedure yields multiplicity‐adjustedP‐values according to the method of Westfall and Young (1993,Resampling‐Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p‐Value Adjustment, 49, 941), which ensures that the rate of false positives (type I error) does not rise when the number of groups and/or diversity indices is extended. Software is available in the R package ‘simboot’.
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
Ricotta, C
通讯作者:
Ricotta, C
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Djira, Gemechis D.;Hothron, Ludwig A.
通讯作者:
Hothron, Ludwig A.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
日本教科教育学会第36回全国大会論文集
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ryoko KODAMA;Miho KATO;Mariko ISHIGURO;玉村かおり・松本伸示
通讯作者:
玉村かおり・松本伸示