Establishing the behavioural limits for countershaded camouflage.

Establishing the behavioural limits for countershaded camouflage.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-017-13914-y
复制
发表时间:
2017-10-20
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Lovell PG
Lovell PG
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Penacchio O;Harris JM;Lovell PG

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

反阴影是一种普遍存在的动物图案,通常面向最高照度的一侧较暗。当调整到特定的照明条件和身体相对于光场的方向时,反阴影通过平衡照明造成的阴影来最小化身体反射的光梯度,因此传统上被认为是视觉伪装的一种适应。然而,当身体相对于光场的方向不是最佳时,隐秘性是否以及如何降低还从未被研究过。我们测试了反阴影身体方向的行为限制,以提供有效的视觉伪装。我们要求人类参与者在模拟三维环境中检测反阴影目标。目标在参考方向上进行了最佳着色以实现隐秘,并在不同方向上显示。对于偏差超过 15 度的搜索性能显着提高。与目标方向与反阴影图案匹配时相比,检测时间显着缩短,准确度显着提高。这项工作证明了保持适合所展示的伪装图案的身体方向的重要性,这表明动物可能存在选择性压力,以适当地调整自己的方向以增强隐秘性。
Countershading is a ubiquitous patterning of animals whereby the side that typically faces the highest illumination is darker. When tuned to specific lighting conditions and body orientation with respect to the light field, countershading minimizes the gradient of light the body reflects by counterbalancing shadowing due to illumination, and has therefore classically been thought of as an adaptation for visual camouflage. However, whether and how crypsis degrades when body orientation with respect to the light field is non-optimal has never been studied. We tested the behavioural limits on body orientation for countershading to deliver effective visual camouflage. We asked human participants to detect a countershaded target in a simulated three-dimensional environment. The target was optimally coloured for crypsis in a reference orientation and was displayed at different orientations. Search performance dramatically improved for deviations beyond 15 degrees. Detection time was significantly shorter and accuracy significantly higher than when the target orientation matched the countershading pattern. This work demonstrates the importance of maintaining body orientation appropriate for the displayed camouflage pattern, suggesting a possible selective pressure for animals to orient themselves appropriately to enhance crypsis.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0221
发表时间: 2009-02-27
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Caro, Tim
通讯作者: Caro, Tim
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9479-5
发表时间: 2011-11-01
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Caro, Tim;Beeman, Karrie;Whitehead, Hal
通讯作者: Whitehead, Hal
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-013-0794-8
发表时间: 2014-02-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Dawson, Terence J.;Webster, Koa N.;Maloney, Shane K.
通讯作者: Maloney, Shane K.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0266
发表时间: 2009-02-27
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Cuthill, Innes C.;Szekely, Aron
通讯作者: Szekely, Aron
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0153
发表时间: 2007-05-22
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Fraser, Stewart;Callahan, Alison;Sherratt, Thomas N.
通讯作者: Sherratt, Thomas N.