Intravitreal Aflibercept in Japanese Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma: The VEGA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Intravitreal Aflibercept in Japanese Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma: The VEGA Randomized Clinical Trial.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s12325-020-01579-5
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
VEGA Investigators
VEGA Investigators
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Inatani M;Higashide T;Matsushita K;Miki A;Ueki M;Iwamoto Y;Kobayashi M;Leal S;VEGA Investigators

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

新生血管性青光眼的特征在于虹膜和前房的新生血管形成。玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子药物可改善眼内压(IOP)和新生血管形成。VEGA试验评估了玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVT-AFL)在新生血管性青光眼患者中的疗效和安全性,这项为期13周的随机、双盲、假对照、III期研究在日本多个研究中心进行,招募了眼前段新生血管形成和IOP > 25 mmHg的患者。患者在基线时接受背景治疗加IVT-AFL(2 mg)或假注射。如果患者表现为IOP > 21 mmHg和虹膜新生血管不完全消退,则重新治疗,在第1周接受额外的假手术或IVT-AFL注射,并在第5周和/或第9周接受IVT-AFL注射。始终保持双盲。主要终点是IOP从基线至第1周的变化。随机分配54例患者(全分析集);符合方案集包括52例患者。第1周时,IVT-AFL组IOP的最小二乘平均变化为−9.9 mmHg,假手术组为−5.0 mmHg [全分析集:差异为−4.9 mmHg(95%置信区间为−10.2至0.3; P = 0.06);符合方案集:−5.5 mmHg(95% CI为−10.8至−0.2; P = 0.04)]。在第1周,接受IVT-AFL的患者中,达到IOP ≤ 21 mmHg的患者比例高于接受假手术的患者,且新生血管分级改善。假手术组中符合再治疗标准并在第1周接受IVT-AFL的患者[n = 22(81.5%)]在第2周时平均IOP额外降低9.2 mmHg,新生血管分级改善的比例从11.5%增加至69.2%。在该组中,第2周时还观察到新生血管形成等级改善的患者比例和达到IOP控制(≤ 21 mmHg)的患者比例增加。总体而言,分别有77.8%和74.1%接受IVT-AFL和假手术/IVT-AFL治疗的患者接受了单次IVT-AFL注射。最常见的眼部治疗后出现的不良事件是点状角膜炎(IVT-AFL组和假手术/IVT-AFL组分别为9.3%:7.4%和11.1%)。IVT-AFL与具有临床意义的IOP控制改善相关,表明IVT-AFL可能是新生血管性青光眼患者的潜在治疗选择。Clinicaltrials.gov标识符,NCT 02396316。本文的在线版本(10.1007/s12325-020-01579-5)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。
Neovascular glaucoma is characterized by neovascularization of the iris and the anterior angle chamber. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents may improve intraocular pressure (IOP) and neovascularization. The VEGA trial assessed the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with neovascular glaucoma in a 13-week, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 study performed at multiple sites in Japan that enrolled patients with anterior segment neovascularization and IOP > 25 mmHg. Patients received background therapy plus IVT-AFL (2 mg) or sham injection at baseline. Patients were re-treated if presenting with IOP > 21 mmHg and incomplete regression of iris neovascularization, receiving additional sham or IVT-AFL injections at week 1 and IVT-AFL injections at weeks 5 and/or 9. Double-masking was maintained throughout. The primary endpoint was change in IOP from baseline to week 1. Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned (full analysis set); the per-protocol set comprised 52 patients. At week 1, the least squares mean change in IOP was −9.9 mmHg for IVT-AFL versus −5.0 mmHg for sham [full analysis set: difference −4.9 mmHg (95% confidence interval −10.2 to 0.3; P = 0.06); per-protocol set: −5.5 mmHg (95% CI −10.8 to −0.2; P = 0.04)]. At week 1, a greater proportion of patients administered IVT-AFL versus sham achieved IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and had improved neovascularization grades. Patients in the sham group who met re-treatment criteria and received IVT-AFL at week 1 [n = 22 (81.5%)] had an additional mean IOP decrease of 9.2 mmHg by week 2, and the proportion with improvement in neovascularization grades increased from 11.5% to 69.2%. Increases in the proportion of patients with improved neovascularization grades and the proportion who achieved IOP control (≤ 21 mmHg) were also observed by week 2 in this group. Overall, 77.8% and 74.1% of patients treated with IVT-AFL and sham/IVT-AFL, respectively, received a single IVT-AFL injection. The most common ocular treatment-emergent adverse event was punctate keratitis (9.3%: 7.4% and 11.1% in the IVT-AFL and sham/IVT-AFL groups, respectively). IVT-AFL was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in IOP control, indicating that IVT-AFL may be a potential treatment option for patients with neovascular glaucoma. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT02396316. The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01579-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
DOI: 10.1159/000431196
发表时间: 2016-01-01
期刊: RETINAL PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICS
影响因子: --
作者:
Havens, Shane J.;Gulati, Vikas
通讯作者: Gulati, Vikas
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2428-y
发表时间: 2013-10-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Lueke, Julia;Nassar, Khaled;Grisanti, Salvatore
通讯作者: Grisanti, Salvatore
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0461-z
发表时间: 2017-02
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Andrés-Guerrero V;Perucho-González L;García-Feijoo J;Morales-Fernández L;Saenz-Francés F;Herrero-Vanrell R;Júlvez LP;Llorens VP;Martínez-de-la-Casa JM;Konstas AG
通讯作者: Konstas AG
DOI: 10.1155/2016/4108490
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Shen X;Chen Y;Wang Y;Yang L;Zhong Y
通讯作者: Zhong Y
新生血管性青光眼:中国三级中心的回顾性研究
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0190-8
发表时间: 2016-01-27
期刊: BMC ophthalmology
影响因子: 2
作者:
Liao N;Li C;Jiang H;Fang A;Zhou S;Wang Q
通讯作者: Wang Q