Developmental Changes in Speed of Processing: Central Limiting Mechanism or Skill Transfer?.
Developmental Changes in Speed of Processing: Central Limiting Mechanism or Skill Transfer?.
复制标题
处理速度的发展变化：中央限制机制还是技能转移？。
DOI：
10.2307/1130281
复制
发表时间：
1988
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
L. Chalip
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Stigler;H. Nusbaum;L. Chalip
詹姆斯·施蒂格勒；霍华德·努斯鲍姆；查利普，劳伦斯。处理速度的发展变化：中心限制机制还是技能转移？儿童发展，1988,59(1):1 - 3。在这篇文章中，我们检验了Kail的说法，即两个任务的发展处理速度曲线的相似性表明，在广泛的认知任务中的表现受到中央限制机制的发展的限制。我们认为，Kail拒绝的“特定学习”假设没有考虑任务间学习迁移的作用，因此假设学习的领域特异性意味着完全的领域独立性。我们通过模拟证明，中心限制机制的运行既不充分也不必要产生Kail观察到的曲线。提出了3种可供选择的技能转移模型，并证明了每个模型产生类似Kail的数据的能力。结论是，Kail收集的数据类型基本上无法识别特定任务和一般任务对性能的约束。
STIGLER, JAMES W.; NUSBAUM, HOWARD C.; and CHALIP, LAURENCE. Developmental Changes in Speed of Processing: Central Limiting Mechanism or Skill Transfer? CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1988, 59, 1144-1153. In this article we examine Kail's claim that similarity in developmental speed-ofprocessing curves for 2 tasks indicates that performance on a wide range of cognitive tasks is constrained by the growth of a central limiting mechanism. We argue that the "specific learning" hypothesis, which Kail rejects, does not consider the role of transfer of learning between tasks, and thus assumes that domain specificity of learning implies complete domain independence. We demonstrate, through simulations, that the operation of a central limiting mechanism is neither sufficient nor necessary to generate the curves observed by Kail. 3 alternative models of skill transfer are proposed, and the ability of each model to generate data similar to Kail's is demonstrated. It is concluded that the types of data collected by Kail are essentially incapable of identifying taskspecific and task-general constraints on performance.
记忆提取的差异：结构有效性调查。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
List,JA;Keating,DP;Merriman,WE
通讯作者：
Merriman,WE
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
KAIL, R
通讯作者：
KAIL, R