Radiofrequency and microwave ablation in a porcine liver model: non-contrast CT and ultrasound radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Radiofrequency and microwave ablation in a porcine liver model: non-contrast CT and ultrasound radiologic-pathologic correlation.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/02656736.2020.1784471
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brace CL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ziemlewicz TJ;Hinshaw JL;Lubner MG;Knott EA;Willey BJ;Lee FT Jr;Brace CL
The goal of this study was to compare intra-procedural radiofrequency (RF) and microwave ablation appearance on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and ultrasound to the zone of pathologic necrosis. Twenty-one 5-minute ablations were performed in vivo in swine liver with 1) microwave at 140 W, 2) microwave at 70 W, or 3) RF at 200 W (n=7 each). CT and US images were obtained simultaneously at 1, 3, and 5 minutes during ablation and 2, 5, and 10 minutes post-ablation. Each ablation was sectioned in the plane of the ultrasound image and underwent vital staining to delineate cellular necrosis. CT was reformatted to the same plane as the ultrasound transducer and transverse diameters of gas and hypoechoic/hypoattenuating zones at each time point were measured. CT, ultrasound and gross pathologic diameter measurements were compared using Student’s t-tests and linear regression. Visible gas and the hypoechoic zone on US images were more predictive of the pathologic ablation zone than on NCCT images (P<0.05). The zone of necrosis was larger than the zone of visible gas on US (mean 3.2 mm for microwave, 6.4 mm for RF) and NCCT (7.6 mm microwave, 13.9 mm RF) images (p < 0.05). The zone of visible gas and hypoechoic zone on US are more predictive of pathology with microwave ablations when compared with RF ablations (p < 0.05). When evaluating images during energy delivery, US is more accurate than CT and microwave- more predictable than RF-ablation based on correlation with in-plane pathology.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.136
发表时间:
2016-05
期刊:
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
影响因子:
--
作者:
Potretzke TA;Ziemlewicz TJ;Hinshaw JL;Lubner MG;Wells SA;Brace CL;Agarwal P;Lee FT Jr
通讯作者:
Lee FT Jr
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Amabile, Claudio;Ahmed, Muneeb;Goldberg, S. Nahum
通讯作者:
Goldberg, S. Nahum
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Campbell, Steven;Uzzo, Robert G.;Pierorazio, Philip M.
通讯作者:
Pierorazio, Philip M.
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Wells SA;Hinshaw JL;Lubner MG;Ziemlewicz TJ;Brace CL;Lee FT Jr
通讯作者:
Lee FT Jr
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Sotirchos, Vlasios S.;Fujisawa, Sho;Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
通讯作者:
Sofocleous, Constantinos T.