Assessing depression in obese women: an examination of two commonly-used measures.

Assessing depression in obese women: an examination of two commonly-used measures.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.015
复制
发表时间:
2013-11
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Pagoto, Sherry L.
Pagoto, Sherry L.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schneider, Kristin L.;Busch, Andrew M.;Whited, Matthew C.;Appelhans, Bradley M.;Waring, Molly E.;Pagoto, Sherry L.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Obesity and depression are associated with somatic complaints that may complicate the measurement of depression in obese individuals. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) are frequently used to measure depression severity. The BDI-II and HRSD’s ability to measure depression severity may be compromised in those with obesity, to the extent that scores on their somatic items stem more from obesity than from depression. This study examined the: 1) internal consistency of the BDI-II and HRSD among obese women who varied in depressive symptomotology and 2) total and item-level change in the measures among participants who met criteria for depression remission at 6-months. Data were from a randomized controlled trial of obese women with depression who received either behavioral activation for depression followed by a lifestyle intervention or a lifestyle intervention with attention control. At screening (n=355), internal consistency was strong for the BDI-II (α=0.89), but moderate for the HRSD (α=0.67). Among participants who met criteria for depression remission following treatment (n=115), every BDI-II item showed significant change at 6-months. In contrast, three HRSD items did not significantly change: the anxiety-somatic (p=0.063), somatic symptoms-gastrointestinal (p=1.000) and loss of weight (p=0.319) items. The BDI-II may be more reliable and sensitive to change than the HRSD in obese women with comorbid depression. Intervention studies involving obese, depressed women should consider these findings in selecting depression outcome measures.
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00156-1
发表时间: 2000-10-01
影响因子: 6.6
作者:
Enns, MW;Larsen, DK;Cox, BJ
通讯作者: Cox, BJ
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9717-2
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: OBESITY SURGERY
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Krukowski, Rebecca A.;Friedman, Kelli E.;Applegate, Katherine L.
通讯作者: Applegate, Katherine L.
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.118
发表时间: 2008-03-01
期刊: OBESITY
影响因子: 6.9
作者:
Patel, Sanjay R.;Hu, Frank B.
通讯作者: Hu, Frank B.
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801449
发表时间: 2000-12-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Britz, B;Siegfried, W;Hebebrand, J
通讯作者: Hebebrand, J
DOI: 10.1176/jnp.23.4.jnp399
发表时间: 2011-09-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Rickards, Hugh;De Souza, Jennifer;Simpson, Sheila A.
通讯作者: Simpson, Sheila A.