Bypassing misinformation without confrontation improves policy support as much as correcting it.
Bypassing misinformation without confrontation improves policy support as much as correcting it.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/s41598-023-33299-5
复制
发表时间：
2023-04-12
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Albarracin, Dolores
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Calabrese, Christopher;Albarracin, Dolores
遏制错误信息的负面影响通常被认为需要纠正误解。然而，可以想象，通过相反含义的替代信念绕过错误信息可能会减少错误信息的态度影响。三个实验，一个是用代表美国人口的样本预先登记的，研究了（a）直接纠正先前为支持限制转基因食品而提供的错误信息（即，纠正策略）和（B）讨论支持转基因食品的信息（即，旁路策略）与仅错误信息控制条件相比。研究结果一致表明，支持具有相反含义的信念在减少对转基因食品的反对方面与纠正有关转基因食品的错误信息一样有效。因此，我们应该在遏制错误信息影响的方法库中增加旁路。
Curbing the negative impact of misinformation is typically assumed to require correcting misconceptions. Conceivably, however, bypassing the misinformation through alternate beliefs of opposite implications may reduce the attitudinal impact of the misinformation. Three experiments, one preregistered with a sample representative of the United States population, examined the impact of (a) directly correcting prior misinformation offered in support of restricting Genetically Modified (GM) foods (i.e., the correction strategy) and (b) discussing information in support of GM foods (i.e., the bypassing strategy), compared to a misinformation-only control condition. Findings consistently revealed that bolstering beliefs with opposite implications is just as effective at reducing opposition to GM foods as is correcting misinformation about GM foods. Thus, bypassing should be added to our arsenal of methods to curb the impact of misinformation.
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Chan, Man-pui Sally;Jones, Christopher R.;Albarracin, Dolores
通讯作者：
Albarracin, Dolores
DOI：
10.1037/h0048563
发表时间：
1960-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子：
--
作者：
MCGUIRE, WJ
通讯作者：
MCGUIRE, WJ