Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask
Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask
复制标题
关于结构现实主义你一直想知道但又不敢问的一切
DOI：
10.1007/s13194-011-0025-7
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
I. Votsis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
I. Votsis
结构主义的观点是一个看到的结构特征的研究领域的利益作为调查的主要目标。这一愿景塑造了语言学、文学批评、美学、社会学、人类学、心理学和哲学各个分支等领域的研究计划。本文的重点是科学哲学中的结构主义，特别是那些努力阐明科学实在论的结构版本的运动，现在通常被称为结构实在论（SR）。本文对结构现实主义的激烈争论进行了批判性调查：它明确阐述了不同的立场以及为支持这些立场而提出的论点，澄清了不同立场之间的相互关系，提请注意迄今为止被忽视的论点，并评估了对社会责任不同方面的批评。只要这对理解社会责任至关重要，就必须注意该领域的历史当代的场景，但记录SR的长期和复杂的发展超出了本文的范围。我们开始介绍结构的集合论概念，我们所关心的许多立场都依赖于这个概念（第2节）。在第三节中，我们介绍了认识论结构实在论的两个主要分支，讨论了针对它们的主要反对意见，最著名的是纽曼的反对意见，并提出了拉姆齐的句子表述。第四节讨论本体结构实在论。在第5节中，我们提出了一些结论性意见。
A structuralist perspective is one that sees the investigation of the structural features of a domain of interest as the primary goal of enquiry. This vision has shaped research programmes in fields as diverse as linguistics, literary criticism, aesthetics, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and various branches of philosophy. The focus of this paper is structuralism in the philosophy of science, and in particular those movements that have endeavoured to articulate a structural version of scientific realism, now commonly referred to as structural realism (SR). The paper provides a critical survey of the debates raging over structural realism: it provides explicit statements of the different positions as well as the arguments put forward to support them, clarifies how the different positions relate to one another, draws attention to hitherto neglected arguments, and evaluates criticisms launched against different strands of SR. Attention to the history of the field is paid in as far as this is essential to understanding the contemporary scene, but documenting the long and intricate development of SR is beyond the scope of this paper. We begin by introducing the set theoretic conception of structure on which many of the positions that we are concerned with rely (Section 2). In Section 3 we introduce the two main strands of epistemic structural realism, discuss the central objections levelled against them, most notably Newman’s objection, and present the Ramsey sentence formulation. Section 4 is dedicated to a discussion of ontic structural realism. In Section 5 we offer some concluding remarks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
L. Floridi
通讯作者：
L. Floridi
物理学和心理学的理论和方法分析；
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1970
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Radner;S. Winokur
通讯作者：
S. Winokur
没有基础主义的基础
影响因子：
0.9
作者：
S. Shapiro
通讯作者：
S. Shapiro
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
W. Salmon;G. Wolters
通讯作者：
G. Wolters
物理理论的目标和结构
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1954
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
O. Spies
通讯作者：
O. Spies