Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process
Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process
复制标题
使政策混乱合理化？
DOI：
10.1068/a40266
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Hertin J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hertin J
对公共政策进行事先评估的程序目前在经合组织各成员国十分流行。他们的设计通常是由一个理性的工具模型的问题解决，它假设知识被收集，评估，然后直接转化为“更好的政策”。但这一模式几乎没有受到三十多年学术研究的影响，这些研究表明，日常政策制定的现实要混乱得多。在本文中，我们分析是否采取事前评估的政策，但能够创造机会，政策审议和学习新的评估知识。借鉴在三个国家和欧盟的政策评估程序的分析，我们发现，有几种方法，评估知识在政策过程中使用。此外，我们认为，政策学习发生尽管，而不是因为，新的评估程序，这往往是一个障碍，公开审议和知识利用的工具设计。
Procedures for the ex ante assessment of public policies are currently in vogue across the OECD. Their design is typically informed by a rational-instrumental model of problem solving, which assumes that knowledge is collected, evaluated, and then translated straightforwardly into ‘better policies’. But this model has been little affected by more than three decades of academic research which has demonstrated that the reality of everyday policy making is far messier. In this paper we analyse whether the uptake of ex ante assessment of policies is nonetheless capable of creating opportunities for policy deliberation and learning informed by new assessment knowledge. Drawing on an analysis of policy assessment procedures in three countries and the European Union, we find that there are several ways in which assessment knowledge is used in the policy process. Moreover, we argue that policy learning occurs despite, rather than because of, the instrumental design of new assessment procedures, which tends to act as a barrier to open deliberation and knowledge utilisation.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1974
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
B. Barnes;D. Bloor;J. Henry
通讯作者：
J. Henry
影响因子：
8.3
作者：
P. Deleon
通讯作者：
P. Deleon
影响因子：
7.9
作者：
C. George;C. Kirkpatrick
通讯作者：
C. Kirkpatrick
影响因子：
9
作者：
Rohit Deshpandé
通讯作者：
Rohit Deshpandé
影响因子：
10.4
作者：
CORWIN, RG;LOUIS, KS
通讯作者：
LOUIS, KS