Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101891
复制
发表时间:
2022-10
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang, Jie;de Jonge, Lucie;Cenin, Dayna R.;Li, Pei;Tao, Sha;Yang, Chen;Yan, Bei;Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
关键词:
The current Shanghai CRC screening program is cost-effective. Changing to a validated FIT would make the program more efficient. The results were sensitive to an increase in the cost of the validated FIT. The results were sensitive to more participation in screening and colonoscopy. The current community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Shanghai, launched in 2013, invited individuals aged 50–74 years to triennial screening with a qualitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and questionnaire-based risk assessment (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the existing Shanghai screening program and compare it to using a validated two-sample quantitative FIT. We simulated four strategies (no screening, Shanghai FIT, Shanghai FIT + RA and validated FIT) for the Shanghai screening program and evaluated CRC incidence, CRC mortality, the number of life years gained (LYG), the number of FITs, and colonoscopies required for each. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess the cost- effectiveness of each strategy. All screening modalities reduced CRC incidence and CRC mortality, gained extra number of LYG compared to no screening. Screening using the Shanghai FIT and validated FIT reduced CRC incidence from 45 cases to 43 per 1,000 simulated individuals (4.4%). Incidence was reduced to 42 cases (6.7%) using the Shanghai FIT + RA. All screening strategies reduced CRC mortality by 10.0% (from 10 to 9 deaths) and resulted in 6 to 7 LYG. The validated FIT was the most cost-effective among the evaluated strategies (ICER ¥26,461 per LYG). Our findings show that the current Shanghai screening program is (cost-) effective compared to no screening, but changing to a validated FIT would make the program more efficient.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Gini A;van Ravesteyn NT;Jansen EEL;Heijnsdijk EAM;Senore C;Anttila A;Novak Mlakar D;Veerus P;Csanádi M;Zielonke N;Heinävaara S;Széles G;Segnan N;de Koning HJ;Lansdorp-Vogelaar I;EU-TOPIA consortium
通讯作者:
EU-TOPIA consortium
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Bao PP;Zheng Y;Wu CX;Huang ZZ;Gao YT;Jin F;Xiang YB;Zhong WJ;Lu W;Wu F
通讯作者:
Wu F
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Hassan, Cesare;Quintero, Enrique;Lieberman, David
通讯作者:
Lieberman, David
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Lin, Guozhen;Feng, Zhiqiang;Li, Ke
通讯作者:
Li, Ke
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Wu D;Luo HQ;Zhou WX;Qian JM;Li JN
通讯作者:
Li JN