Tracking conversational repetition: an evaluation of target monitoring ability
Tracking conversational repetition: an evaluation of target monitoring ability
复制标题
跟踪对话重复：目标监控能力的评估
DOI：
10.1002/acp.1167
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
A. Memon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alan S. Brown;Susan L. Hornstein;A. Memon
在本研究中评估了跟踪一个人告诉谁信息（目标监测）的能力。参与者在间隔一天的四次对话中与目标对象分享个人信息，并被指示不要在连续的对话中向同一个人重复信息。在信息共享会议期间在线评估目标监测的成功程度，并在最后一次会议之后回顾性评估目标监测的成功程度。在线监控，或者避免告诉别人你之前告诉过他们的事情，在只有一个先前共享的事实（第二和第三阶段）时非常好，但在两个先前共享的事实（第四阶段）时就会下降。回顾监测，或者记住先前的事实对人的分配，在第一阶段是最准确的，但在第二阶段急剧下降，并在第四阶段保持不变。回顾性事实对人分配中的时间错误倾向于以天为单位向前移动（伸缩）。源、目标信息交换的复杂相互关系有待进一步研究。版权所有©2006约翰威利父子有限公司
The ability to track who one tells information to (target monitoring) is evaluated in the present study. Participants shared personal information with target persons across four sessions spaced one day apart, and were instructed not to duplicate information to the same person over successive conversations. Target monitoring success was evaluated both on-line, during the information sharing sessions, and retrospectively, following the final session. On-line monitoring, or avoiding telling someone what you told them before, was very good with only one prior shared fact (Sessions 2 and 3), but declined with two prior shared facts (Session 4). Retrospective monitoring, or remembering prior fact-to-person assignments, was most accurate for Session 1, but dropped off sharply for Session 2 and remained constant through Session 4. Temporal errors in retrospective fact-to-person assignment tend to shift forward in days (telescoping). Further research is needed on the complex interrelationship of source and target information exchanges. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.25.1.3
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
L. Jacoby
通讯作者：
L. Jacoby