Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands.
Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands.
复制标题
造林或强烈的放牧改善了废弃的热带农田的生态和经济价值。
DOI:
10.1038/ncomms6612
复制
发表时间:
2014-11-26
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Beck, Erwin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Knoke, Thomas;Bendix, Joerg;Pohle, Perdita;Hamer, Ute;Hildebrandt, Patrick;Roos, Kristin;Gerique, Andres;Sandoval, Maria L.;Breuer, Lutz;Tischer, Alexander;Silva, Brenner;Calvas, Baltazar;Aguirre, Nikolay;Castro, Luz M.;Windhorst, David;Weber, Michael;Stimm, Bernd;Guenter, Sven;Palomeque, Ximena;Mora, Julio;Mosandl, Reinhard;Beck, Erwin
Increasing demands for livelihood resources in tropical rural areas have led to progressive clearing of biodiverse natural forests. Restoration of abandoned farmlands could counter this process. However, as aims and modes of restoration differ in their ecological and socio-economic value, the assessment of achievable ecosystem functions and benefits requires holistic investigation. Here we combine the results from multidisciplinary research for a unique assessment based on a normalization of 23 ecological, economic and social indicators for four restoration options in the tropical Andes of Ecuador. A comparison of the outcomes among afforestation with native alder or exotic pine, pasture restoration with either low-input or intense management and the abandoned status quo shows that both variants of afforestation and intense pasture use improve the ecological value, but low-input pasture does not. Economic indicators favour either afforestation or intense pasturing. Both Mestizo and indigenous Saraguro settlers are more inclined to opt for afforestation. Restoration of abandoned farmlands has the potential to improve ecosystem functions and benefits. Using a multidisciplinary approach, Knoke et al. show that ecological and economic indicators favour either afforestation or intense pasturing of these abandoned areas in the tropical Andes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Bonan, Gordon B.;Lawrence, Peter J.;Swenson, Sean C.
通讯作者:
Swenson, Sean C.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Goettlicher, D.;Obregon, A.;Bendix, J.
通讯作者:
Bendix, J.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1114773109
发表时间:
2012-06-05
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Daniel, Terry C.;Muhar, Andreas;von der Dunk, Andreas
通讯作者:
von der Dunk, Andreas
影响因子:
--
作者:
BRAY, RH;KURTZ, LT
通讯作者:
KURTZ, LT
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Guswa, Andrew J.;Brauman, Kate A.;Sayre, Susan Stratton
通讯作者:
Sayre, Susan Stratton