Brief report: How short is too short? An ultra-brief measure of the big-five personality domains implicates "agreeableness" as a risk for all-cause mortality.
Brief report: How short is too short? An ultra-brief measure of the big-five personality domains implicates "agreeableness" as a risk for all-cause mortality.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1359105317720819
复制
发表时间：
2019-09
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Elliot AJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chapman BP;Elliot AJ
在健康研究中使用简明的五大标尺存在争议。我们在一般社会调查中调查了一项超简短的指标--五大清单-10与死亡率之间的联系。适宜性评分与较高的死亡风险相关(危险比 = 1.26，p = .017)。这一效果归因于得分颠倒的条目“倾向于挑剔他人”，因此越挑剔就预示着更低的死亡风险。尽职尽责量表接近元分析估计值，不够精确，不足以产生重要意义。那些在健康研究中寻求五大衡量标准的人应该意识到，五大清单-10可能会产生不同寻常的结果。
Controversy exists over the use of brief Big Five scales in health studies. We investigated links between an ultra-brief measure, the Big Five Inventory-10, and mortality in the General Social Survey. The Agreeableness scale was associated with elevated mortality risk (hazard ratio = 1.26, p = .017). This effect was attributable to the reversed-scored item “Tends to find fault with others,” so that greater fault-finding predicted lower mortality risk. The Conscientiousness scale approached meta-analytic estimates, which were not precise enough for significance. Those seeking Big Five measurement in health studies should be aware that the Big Five Inventory-10 may yield unusual results.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Rammstedt, Beatrice;John, Oliver P.
通讯作者：
John, Oliver P.
影响因子：
2
作者：
Thiébaut, ACM;Bénichou, J
通讯作者：
Bénichou, J
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Ludeke, Steven G.;Larsen, Erik Gahner
通讯作者：
Larsen, Erik Gahner
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Strickhouser, Jason E.;Zell, Ethan;Krizan, Zlatan
通讯作者：
Krizan, Zlatan
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Muennig, Peter;Johnson, Gretchen;Rosen, Zohn
通讯作者：
Rosen, Zohn