Are all cognitive therapies alike? A comparison of cognitive and noncognitive therapy process and implications for the application of empirically supported treatments.
Are all cognitive therapies alike? A comparison of cognitive and noncognitive therapy process and implications for the application of empirically supported treatments.
复制标题
所有认知疗法都相似吗?
DOI:
10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.150
复制
发表时间:
2003
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Thompson,Larry
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Malik,MaryL;Beutler,LarryE;Alimohamed,Shabia;Gallagher-Thompson,Dolores;Thompson,Larry
The definition of an empirically supported treatment (EST) arguably embodies 2 untested assumptions:(a) that different manualized renditions of the same therapy are functionally equivalent and (b) that therapies can be reliably applied independently of therapist, setting, and format. These assumptions were tested as applied to cognitive therapy (CT), using process data from a large multisite study (N= 235) that included 3 cognitive and 6 alternative therapies. Although the non-CTs were more variable than the CTs on 2 of 4 dimensions studied (directiveness and emotional arousal), there was considerable variation among the 3 CTs, even when implemented in the current context of rigorous training, manualization, and adherence checks. Results are discussed as related to the assumptions underlying EST criteria.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
A. Bergin
通讯作者:
A. Bergin
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
M. Horowitz;N. Kaltreider
通讯作者:
N. Kaltreider
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
T. Anderson;H. Strupp
通讯作者:
H. Strupp
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
L. Luborsky;G. Woody;A. Mclellan;C. O'brien;J. Rosenzweig
通讯作者:
J. Rosenzweig
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Feeley,M;DeRubeis,RJ;Gelfand,LA
通讯作者:
Gelfand,LA