Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity.
Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1088868310366253
复制
发表时间：
2011-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Terracciano A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McCrae RR;Kurtz JE;Yamagata S;Terracciano A
我们检查了 NEO 库存中有关分面量表差异可靠性和有效性的数据 (N = 34,108)。我们评估了（a）方面量表的心理测量特性在不同年龄、文化和测量方法中的普遍适用程度； (b) 有效性标准与不同形式的可靠性相关。对方面尺度稳定性、遗传力和跨观察者有效性的综合估计具有广泛的普遍性。重新测试可靠性的两个估计是三个有效性标准的独立预测因子；内部一致性的三个估计都不是。现有证据表明其他性格调查表也有相同的结果模式。量表的内部一致性可用于检查数据质量，但对于评估已开发量表的潜在有效性似乎作用有限，并且不应将其用作重新测试可靠性的替代品。需要对重测可靠性的性质和决定因素进行进一步研究。
We examined data (N = 34,108) on the differential reliability and validity of facet scales from the NEO Inventories. We evaluated the extent to which (a) psychometric properties of facet scales are generalizable across ages, cultures, and methods of measurement; and (b) validity criteria are associated with different forms of reliability. Composite estimates of facet scale stability, heritability, and cross-observer validity were broadly generalizable. Two estimates of retest reliability were independent predictors of the three validity criteria; none of three estimates of internal consistency was. Available evidence suggests the same pattern of results for other personality inventories. Internal consistency of scales can be useful as a check on data quality, but appears to be of limited utility for evaluating the potential validity of developed scales, and it should not be used as a substitute for retest reliability. Further research on the nature and determinants of retest reliability is needed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Costa, PT;Bagby, RM;McCrae, RR
通讯作者：
McCrae, RR
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
CHURCHILL, GA;PETER, JP
通讯作者：
PETER, JP
影响因子：
5
作者：
BORKENAU, P;LIEBLER, A
通讯作者：
LIEBLER, A
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Bleidorn, Wiebke;Kandler, Christian;Spinath, Frank M.
通讯作者：
Spinath, Frank M.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
CAREY, G;GOLDSMITH, HH;GOTTESMAN, II
通讯作者：
GOTTESMAN, II