Moving back or moving forward? Return migration, development and peace-building
Moving back or moving forward? Return migration, development and peace-building
复制标题
向后移动还是向前移动？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Davids
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Houte;T. Davids
本文讨论了在何种情况下从欧洲返回冲突后国家的移民愿意并能够为原籍国的发展与和平建设作出贡献。基于对全球六个国家的比较研究和对阿富汗的深入研究，我们探讨了（1）回归后经历的异质性，（2）回归移民的复杂意义和动机，以及（3）对移民特征的期望，回归移民，发展与和平建设之间的联系是基于这些特征。基于这些发现，我们（4）探索返回移民的潜力，成为变革的推动者。我们发现，虽然移徙和发展政策所依据的期望只适用于一小部分回返者，但这并不是政策所针对的群体。为了制定适当的政策，解决返回者的需求和潜力，我们建议对现行政策进行两项修改：第一，事实上的自愿和非自愿返回应重新定义为涵盖这一问题的更相关的术语。第二，我们建议重新评估和理清移徙与发展政策的不同目标
This article addresses under which circumstances migrants returning from European to (post-) conflict countries are willing and able to contribute to development and peace-building in their countries of origin. Based on comparative research in six countries world-wide and an in-depth study in Afghanistan, we explore (1) the heterogeneity of the post-return experience, (2) the complex meanings and motivations of return migration, and (3) the expectations of the characteristics of migrants, on which the link between return migration, development and peace-building is based. Based on these findings, we (4) explore return migrants’ potential to be agents of change. We find that while the expectations on which migration and development policies are based only count for a small minority of returnees, this is not the group that is targeted by policy. In order to formulate adequate policies that do address the needs and potential of returnees, we propose two modifications to current policy: First, de facto voluntary and involuntary return should be redefined into more relevant terms that cover the matter. Second, we propose to re-evaluate and disentangle the different goals that inform migration and development policies
了解遣返：难民对安全、重返社会和希望重要性的看法
DOI：
10.1002/psp.647
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
Population, Space and Place
影响因子：
--
作者：
Zimmermann S
通讯作者：
Zimmermann S